This is probably where i get into territory that might not be safe, but we'll see.
The testing was done with Amber Neben, current World TT Champ. Last year, she was on a Trek Speed Concept, which wasn't an official team bike, but her contract allowed her to use whatever she wanted. Obviously it worked very well for her. This year, her bike sponsor is Cervelo, but she was still allowed to ride whatever frame she wanted if she could show one was faster than the other. We spent a few days aero testing in both the tunnel and velodrome to find out, in the end, the P5-3 and the Speed Concept were "tied" with one another. We achieved that tie, though, by getting rid of the Aduro, and using the ENVE SES, which allowed us to angle her forearms. Something I changed for her last year when we re-worked her position entirely. The only way we could get her low enough on the SES was to use a Ritchey Comp stem with a -30 degree angle. We did, by the way, try to simply put up-turned extensions on the Aduro, but it was still slower than the SES.
ENVE got wind (no pun intended) of the testing, and suggested we use the new stem, but she raced with it and got some weird numbers that didn't seem to match up aero-wise. It, of course, made no sense that the new ENVE stem was slower, but we needed to rule it out since it was seemingly the only change made. Testing multiple times showed the new stem to be approx 6 watts faster than the same bar setup with the Ritchey stem. All other fit coordinates with adjusted for the difference in stem angles and length. We did eventually figure out why the numbers were off, but it wasn't related to the aero bar or stem set up.
Kurt's a great guy and always fun to work with.
Jim Manton /
ERO Sports