In early March i did a 20 min FTP test on a tri bike on a trainer. In April i broke out the road bike, the first year with a power meter on the road bike.. It is very difficult, to near impossible, to safely do an accurate outside FTP test here. Too many stoplights, cars, turning traffic, etc. I normally put the tri bike back on the trainer before races and do an FTP test, but now that I have a road bike PM I would like to avoid doing that.
Tonight I hammered a very hilly loop that took 1:20. Connect and GC agree that my best 20 min average was 1 watt less than my FTP test performance and my best 60 min average was 1 watt more than my FTP calculated off the 20 min test. So within margin of error. However, Connect says my NP for the entire ride was 12 watts higher than my FTP.
Since NP is the steady power needed to achieve the same results, should I use that as my new FTP? Thoughts
"...the street finds its own uses for things"
Tonight I hammered a very hilly loop that took 1:20. Connect and GC agree that my best 20 min average was 1 watt less than my FTP test performance and my best 60 min average was 1 watt more than my FTP calculated off the 20 min test. So within margin of error. However, Connect says my NP for the entire ride was 12 watts higher than my FTP.
Since NP is the steady power needed to achieve the same results, should I use that as my new FTP? Thoughts
"...the street finds its own uses for things"