So, we all know the type. Guy at the pool or on a ride who has done an Ironman and is talking about how he's got a shot at a Kona slot this year. Well, that guy apparently found my pool recently and is letting everyone know how he's "looking to qualify this year." (uh, aren't we all?) So I did what anybody with too much time on his hands would do and I looked into his results -- 12 hours at IMLP (only full as far as I can tell), but consistently in the 4:45 range at the half distance.
Looking at the slot times from prior years for the relevant AG, he'd have to go sub-10 to get a slot and even the high 9:50s might not be good enough. Accordingly, I was curious what the ST group thought about the possibility of knocking over 2 hours off your time. From 14 hours to 12 hours? Sure, I can see that. From 12 to 10, seems like it's exponentially harder. Not saying it hasn't been done or can't be done, but from one race to the next? Anyway, slow day at work so thought I'd see what you guys thought.
(For the record, I am not the "guy". I'm hoping just to break 11 hours this year.)
I proudly DO NOT post my workouts on Facebook!!!
Looking at the slot times from prior years for the relevant AG, he'd have to go sub-10 to get a slot and even the high 9:50s might not be good enough. Accordingly, I was curious what the ST group thought about the possibility of knocking over 2 hours off your time. From 14 hours to 12 hours? Sure, I can see that. From 12 to 10, seems like it's exponentially harder. Not saying it hasn't been done or can't be done, but from one race to the next? Anyway, slow day at work so thought I'd see what you guys thought.
(For the record, I am not the "guy". I'm hoping just to break 11 hours this year.)
I proudly DO NOT post my workouts on Facebook!!!