Would it be a an enormous and likely too taxing and unenjoyable stretch to go from Olympic distance to the full Ironman distance?
I just completed my first tri, an olympic distance.
My initial plan was to do a 70.3 this year (and maybe an Olympic and some shorter running races thrown in there) and then do a full Ironman the following year.
But was sort of thinking, why wait if the ultimate goal is 140.6? Why not just go for my ultimate goal? I have no kids, no significant other. I'm turning 34 in January, seems like as good of a time as ever to just go for it...
I should mention that I did battle some knee and shin issues in my training for the Olympic. I plan to get to a physical therapist and do what is necessary to heal/prevent those issues from coming up again hopefully.
Would I be setting myself up for a really unenjoyable experience and likely failure here? Maybe even likely injury?
Goal would be to finish with around average times in each discipline.
I just completed my first tri, an olympic distance.
My initial plan was to do a 70.3 this year (and maybe an Olympic and some shorter running races thrown in there) and then do a full Ironman the following year.
But was sort of thinking, why wait if the ultimate goal is 140.6? Why not just go for my ultimate goal? I have no kids, no significant other. I'm turning 34 in January, seems like as good of a time as ever to just go for it...
I should mention that I did battle some knee and shin issues in my training for the Olympic. I plan to get to a physical therapist and do what is necessary to heal/prevent those issues from coming up again hopefully.
Would I be setting myself up for a really unenjoyable experience and likely failure here? Maybe even likely injury?
Goal would be to finish with around average times in each discipline.