jpk_phx wrote:
Bryan! wrote:
jpk_phx wrote:
Bryan! wrote:
The first year was a dismal failure.
Strongly disagree. I did the race and it was awesome. But I planned way ahead and had none of the travel or logistical issues that others complained of.
The numbers for the second year were shaping up to be dismal, but the race itself was great.
Your travel planning success aside - for Ironman, at the macro level, when a new race (that was shortened) only lasts for one year itâs a dismal failure. Just like NYC. As a result, I suspect that Ironman thinks it was anything but âgreatâ or âawesomeâ.
Thanks for the Ted talk on economics. I don't really care about WTC's finances but for those of us who participated it was a good time and a great community.
To a very minor degree at least, you should care about their financial success if you want to participate in any of their future races. Because if they fail, youâll be forced to race locally leaving your travel planning talents at bay.