rrheisler wrote:
Slowman wrote:
RandMart wrote:
I admit this, yes - here in Jersey, I've always seen posts about "such & such a product dropping at Sea Otter" or "big news from Sea Otter" or "so & so was a Sea Otter" but rarely any results or race coverage; maybe I wasn't looking hard enough?
My failure, absolutely
not a failure. just a geographic reality.
sea otter is a race or, precisely, a series of races throughout a 3 or 4 day span. the expo was an adjunct to the racing and because sea otter has expanded to become a road, MTB, gravel and whatever else event the expo has gain in importance.
sea otter will have an industry day for the first time, the day before the public racing starts, and it never intended to be a trade show. it morphed into a de facto show for the industry - or, just a get together for the industry - upon the demise of interbike.
sea otter set itself up for this by paying attention to its expo.
look at this page. where is the analog to this on IM's site? because sea otter is now owned by life time it's not really that different from IM in that it's got a lot of events, it sells partnerships, both individually and series-wide, and it's got expos. the difference is in how this expo is treated. it's an open expo; no protected categories; and it's just a kick ass event. this makes it that much more appealing to partners. i would guess that sea otter takes in as much revenue with the expo as IM will take in with its entire IM oceanside 70.3 event. that oceanside expo could take in a half-mil in revenue but i think you see the difference in the importance sea otter places on its expo versus the presence IM has for its expos on its public facing content. maybe i'm naive but to me either sea otter is right or IM is right.
i don't see how they can both be right. Replying to the last line.
They can both be right for the business models that they are looking to develop and entertain out of the expo. For IM, it appears that they really want to be the only game in town -- their retail store, their preferred bike shop, the host area, a couple of pop-up food options and...that's it. To be fair, in certain towns that winds up being of even greater benefit to the local bike and run stores on race week (looking at you, Lake Placid). In others, I'd imagine it looks more like a desert -- but as long as IM is selling a metric crapton (obviously superior to imperial craptons) of their wares, they are OK with it.
Sea Otter, meanwhile, is more of a showcase for everybody else, and now the default "big bike show" in the world. They just serve different purposes.
In my opinion, the current strategy of big events are drying the market.
Big expos are part of the show/event. People like to be there, to be able to see/touch what it is in the market, and if the prices are ok, buy stuffs (some of them not available in their local stores).
Current situation is that the expos are small, with little offer, and very expensive. So you cannot even buy last time stuff. The balance is difficult but as it was already said, Kona expo was disappointing. But I was in Ironman Austria in 2022, and also it was sad to see.
In my opinion, if they allow to have a big offer, with good prices they will sell really a lot: - If I can find my "personal choice" for nutrition, spares, etc.. at a good price, I would not travel with it maybe. If they have big tents, I could tast an "exotic new flavour"... if I can find the latest stuff at its price, I could see if it worth and buy...
This is my opinion only, maybe, but expos have changed from " a must" to a "I hope that there is another place in town to buy what I forget to bring".