Was looking at upgrading my disc and I noticed something interesting.
Since Josh at Silca has told us about the rule of 105 (i.e. wheel width must be at least 105% of tyre width to avoid flow seperation), and wheel companies obviously know this since wheels are going wider- then why are many discs still narrow, especially the tubular discs?
For example-
Zipp 900- 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Ffwd disc - 22 mm (optimal tyre 23mm)
Reynolds element - 20.8mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Renn - 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
RON - 19mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
Mavic comete (previously 19mm, now 21.5mm) - optimal tyre 22mm)
Lightweight- 20mm (optimal tyre 19mm )
Pro-lite padova -21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Dt swiss -20mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
3t orbis - 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm )
Ursus- 20mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
Citec 8000- 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
OTOH, we have wide discs like the zipp super9/sub9, flo disc, hed jet and stinger, the new premier, D2Z, pro, and these guys seem to be the trendsetters for aero.
So if wide = better given the trend toward 23 and 25 tyres, why havent most discs gotten wider as well? Is this a matter of the big aero boys being ahead and the others playing catch up? Or is it a case of width doesnt matter as much for the rear wheel and there are other factors at play?
If I had to hazard a guess, it would be that flow seperation isnt as much of an issue on the rear disc because of the huge surface air has to be controlled all the way to the rear, and other more important factors- like say making sure your disc can fit a majority of bikes- is the goal here.
What are your thoughts guys?
Since Josh at Silca has told us about the rule of 105 (i.e. wheel width must be at least 105% of tyre width to avoid flow seperation), and wheel companies obviously know this since wheels are going wider- then why are many discs still narrow, especially the tubular discs?
For example-
Zipp 900- 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Ffwd disc - 22 mm (optimal tyre 23mm)
Reynolds element - 20.8mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Renn - 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
RON - 19mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
Mavic comete (previously 19mm, now 21.5mm) - optimal tyre 22mm)
Lightweight- 20mm (optimal tyre 19mm )
Pro-lite padova -21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
Dt swiss -20mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
3t orbis - 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm )
Ursus- 20mm (optimal tyre 19mm)
Citec 8000- 21mm (optimal tyre 20mm)
OTOH, we have wide discs like the zipp super9/sub9, flo disc, hed jet and stinger, the new premier, D2Z, pro, and these guys seem to be the trendsetters for aero.
So if wide = better given the trend toward 23 and 25 tyres, why havent most discs gotten wider as well? Is this a matter of the big aero boys being ahead and the others playing catch up? Or is it a case of width doesnt matter as much for the rear wheel and there are other factors at play?
If I had to hazard a guess, it would be that flow seperation isnt as much of an issue on the rear disc because of the huge surface air has to be controlled all the way to the rear, and other more important factors- like say making sure your disc can fit a majority of bikes- is the goal here.
What are your thoughts guys?