HankRearden wrote:
Another factor is UA chose to get political, with a left lean. I’m not making a political statement, but clearly that strategy hasn’t worked out so well for a few others, namely ESPN, the NFL and Hollywood. It doesn’t really pay to lean in any direction, but the bs coming out of Plank was just too much.
You can look at it that way if you like. ESPN is suffering from structural issues surrounding their cable-oriented approach and cord-cutting. The NFL has issues involving oversaturation (Sundays are no longer as special with the expanding slate of Thursday games, and the product on the field is crap compared to previous years (many of the highest-profile players are out for the season and games have been both less competitive and less competent). I am what you would probably think of as a raging liberal and love football
and support the protests, but am watching less this season because of these listed reasons. This article addresses both (indirectly for ESPN, but it's hugely dependent on cable subscriptions which are, as mentioned, declining).
http://money.cnn.com/...-networks/index.html Hollywood I have much less knowledge of, but there is some talk of the rising importance of global box office sales leading to studios producing films with more international and less domestic appeal. The F&F franchise was mentioned specifically in this context.
The point is, ladies and gentleman, that speed, for lack of a better word, is good. Speed is right, Speed works. Speed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.