Depends hugely on your volume and also on some buying choices when it comes to cycling. Swimming costs are pretty fixed regardless of volume (pool membership is high, swim suits and goggles are cheap and last a long time). Cycling and running costs rise the more you do.
Personally, when I'm swimming regularly enough to need pool membership, it's my most expensive sport. I'm in London and access to a decent swimming pool costs more like £1000/year. That gives access to a gym and classes as well, but I don't do classes and can do enough strength and indoor training at home that I wouldn't bother with membership unless I needed the pool.
Running is the cheapest, I don't really track how many miles I get out of a pair of shoes but I certainly ignore the advice of the manufacturer and don't think I've ever got through more than 2 pairs in a year. Even if I buy some running kit as well then that's still less than half the cost of pool membership, and some of my running kit is 10 years old and still going strong.
Cycling depends whether I do the actual cost, or the "wife cost" which factors in that I commute to work by bike which saves me literally thousands of pounds a year and by my spousal accounting system makes cycling a profit centre and not actually a cost at all! Even if I just look at the expenditure then I typically spend less on cycling than pool membership would cost me. I have a mountain of kit but some of it is >10 years old and I just add a few choice bits each year when there's a sale on. I do all my own bike maintenance and bought most of the tools I need years ago. Bikes typically last me over 10 years, so annual cost isn't that much, and I do most of my training on fairly cheap and long-lasting wheels and tires.
Personally, when I'm swimming regularly enough to need pool membership, it's my most expensive sport. I'm in London and access to a decent swimming pool costs more like £1000/year. That gives access to a gym and classes as well, but I don't do classes and can do enough strength and indoor training at home that I wouldn't bother with membership unless I needed the pool.
Running is the cheapest, I don't really track how many miles I get out of a pair of shoes but I certainly ignore the advice of the manufacturer and don't think I've ever got through more than 2 pairs in a year. Even if I buy some running kit as well then that's still less than half the cost of pool membership, and some of my running kit is 10 years old and still going strong.
Cycling depends whether I do the actual cost, or the "wife cost" which factors in that I commute to work by bike which saves me literally thousands of pounds a year and by my spousal accounting system makes cycling a profit centre and not actually a cost at all! Even if I just look at the expenditure then I typically spend less on cycling than pool membership would cost me. I have a mountain of kit but some of it is >10 years old and I just add a few choice bits each year when there's a sale on. I do all my own bike maintenance and bought most of the tools I need years ago. Bikes typically last me over 10 years, so annual cost isn't that much, and I do most of my training on fairly cheap and long-lasting wheels and tires.