seeyouincourt wrote:
The ebay purchase is exactly the same. I purchased from an unauthorized dealer. Apparently your friend did too. The only relevant difference is that I know I made an unauthorized purchase and was perfectly willing to take a chance. Your friend didn't know if the purchase was from an authorized dealer and I'm sure he didn't think he was taking a chance.
But, every website has terms and conditions. His purchase came with terms and conditions that said, in effect, don't buy if you don't agree. And if you read it, it says we accept returns, and we will handle it, and if you aren't satisfied we have online dispute resolution that apparently does t apply to you. Oh by the way, if you want to sue us, we're in England and English law and courts apply to the purchase.
It doesn't mean necessarily that 3T is off the hook. Just practically speaking they are. It's a $150 part. Now, if they were making airbags that were killing people, we'd be having a different conversation. Obviously. But it's a carbon part, and its used for racing, which raise all kinds of legal issues. Anyway, your state may have consumer protection laws that give you, err your friend, important legal rights. Some states have powerful consumer protection statutes. What state are you in. Err, your friend.
Much appreciated. The friend is in VA. I'm in PA....
it's complicated.
hmmm, I don't know if I see ebay and Wiggle as the same. I see your black and white authorized-dealer point, but ebay is a platform for independent sellers to sell through... and, if the part broke upon the 2nd use of the product, I know for a fact that ebay would swiftly take care of the issue, seeing to it that the buyer was refunded or the part was replaced; I know that for a fact.
will be interested to see your thoughts on the VA state laws.
I didn't see Kiley's response as bullshit. Sure, victim-blame away. Blame the customer. Feel good about it. But, when you're the manufacturer doing that blaming, is that the best move for your business? I really don't think it is.
I'm not saying every company should pull a Tacx; I'm not convinced that is a great business decision, swooping in and fixing every wrong and never letting the consumer handle some of the responsibility, but there's middle ground. And that's the point, find the middle ground. That's good for building a brand. And note, the friend was asking for the aluminum cradles as replacements, not the carbon cradles. He wanted safety after he avoided crashing at 26+ mph when the carbon cradles broke. I mean, that seems like some good middle ground: 3T, you didn't a sh*t job monitoring who sells your high end products. A customer avoid a possible catastrophic crash when your product failed, he wants a dirt cheap replacement part and he's willing to take the time to communicate with you multiple times about the warranty procedure, he's willing to ship the part back to Wiggle for inspection, he provided you with clear images showing the product failure..... but their response was 'sorry, there's nothing we can do.' So, why would I buy a Strada, now? serious question; I was genuinely planning to make the Strada my next road bike. Why-tf would I do that now? What, because I'm buying it through an authorized dealer? Really? Why would I buy a second set of THM cranks? Why would I advise more friends to purchase 3T products, as I had advised this "friend"?
So sure, as a manufacturer, victim-blame away, great business strategy. I'll have to pair up with my economic and strategy phd counterparts to write a business case study on this wonderfully effective strategy. Maybe we can create a strategic stakeholder quandrant with CSR (corporate social responsibility) in one corner, and ACVB (apathetic consumer victim blaming) in the opposing quadrant...
wovebike.com |
Wove on instagram