Calvinbal6 wrote:
I haven't revealed anything that isn't already known, but for some reason people perseverate about fascial release as a means for recovery without any real support for it. Let's stick to what is researched and known to work.
As I mentioned before, I am not interested in opinions on pro-stretching versus anti-stretching. Or pro-release versus anti-release techniques (fellow perverts have fun with this one), and neither should you. Reason being, it's fruitless to say which is better or not,
simply because for every single article written there's an article that claims otherwise (many peer-reviewed through some medical site such as, PubMed, etc.).
On the PFPS piece you wrote, there's probably at least a billion descriptive words on the internet (and probably a million of those descriptive words are here on Slowtwitch) describing PFPS. Even less interested in another academic description of PFPS, because arguments about PFPS causation are all over the map.
Here's what I AM interested in and is the premise for my thread: and that is, what has worked for people through their very own empirical experiences?
Here's my empirical experiences with being a "practitioner" of PFPS and PT (jumper's knee): Once you have these overuse injuries they never really completely go away. You have to learn to manage them through various forms of stretching, equipment choice, changes to technique, long periods of rest, etc. People who have experienced these injuries are probably in complete agreement.
Cheers,
G