devashish_paul wrote:
In any case, in a country as rich and resourceful as Japan, it is a bit surprising that they can't pull together an IM Japan event. Hokkaido seemed doomed right out of the start with too tough a course and bad weather.
Yes, it is certainly perplexing as to why IM has had such a chequered history in Japan.
I thought they had finally hit on the right location in Hokkaido. The island is relatively sparsely populated, Toya-ko is conveniently close to Sapporo for transport connections, it is a beautifully clean lake for swimming and the cycling course is both scenic and challenging.
Hokkaido is less susceptible to typhoons than the rest of Japan (both in frequency and severity), so weather is less likely to be a factor than the previous courses.
Not sure about the course being too tough. The swim and run certainly hid no demons.
Perhaps the cycle might turn off a few international athletes, but I can't imagine it would deter the average Japanese triathlete and that's the demographic critical to the race's continued viability. Plenty of kick-arse endurance races in Japan have been staged for decades with little or no foreign interest and I think it's a bit ethnocentric to think that Ironman need be any different. With the spread of the franchise around the globe, a smaller proportion of athletes now race IM internationally than they did in the days of just NZ/Aust/Japan/Germany/Kona and if there's a thriving domestic scene and it's not a "resort" or "destination" race, luring foreigners is now largely irrelevant to a race's ongoing success.
I always thought the run course would have been pretty cool with a single lap circling the lake, (a neat 26 miles and a beautiful run in it's own right), but the logistics of the multiple out-and-back option is obviously less complicated.
Part of me would like to have raced Toya-ko. It was probably the only IM-branded event of recent years that appeared satisfactorily attractive for me to consider overcoming my aversion to dragging my tri gear overseas.