B_Doughtie wrote:
Once you've hit an certain status in the pro ranks ST forum does nothing for you. You then just bang out tweets/blogs and you'll maintain a following.
IE- how many people in top 50 of the money list are on ST. "Developing" pros are more on here than established guys.
There are no Gwens, no Sarah's, no crowie, no Dave Scott, no macca, no Frodo, no Sebi. Because they don't need it.
With respect to Lionel, who is a of course an outstanding athlete, he isn't in the same class as those you mentioned. Of course, if you win an Olympic title or Kona, you don't need Slowtwitch. Lionel hasn't even come close to that standard.
Beyond that, you might be right. Maybe his participation here doesn't make a shred of difference to his monetary success in triathlon going forward. But I think the leadership of the sport -- and the leadership of the companies that are derivative of it -- congregates on these boards either to post or to lurk. And I think that matters to that leadership. It's just another social media platform but arguably one of the more important in triathlon.
I don't like Lionel, but I do like his participation here. I don't like a lot of his views and how he has chosen to express them as a professional athlete, but I hope that he sticks around. Unlike the rest of you fucks, I
like to hear opinions I don't like -- it challenges me and my own preconceived notions. That's why
I come here. For the internet, this is an exceptionally safe place to have an opinion, even a bad one.
Also to the rest of you: you guys seem to think I'm just a garden variety troll, when what you really mean is that I am someone with opinions you disagree with, which is pretty weak sauce. The classic troll disguises his identity or poses as someone else; incites emotion for his own amusement; pretends to hold opinions he does not believe; and imperils sustained and relevant discussion. I have never disguised my identity; I don't
usually post solely for my own amusement; I typically believe what I write, even as I'm prone to exaggeration and hyperbole; and I incite emotions on topics in a form that very often leads to high quality, relevant discussions.
Meanwhile, I am the troll. Yet you guys come one here and say, on this thread alone:
-You're a douche bag (3x)
-You have a small penis
-You are a girl
I mean, what in the actual fuck? At this point, my working assumption for those who have made such sixth grade-level ad hominem statements is that they are too intellectually impotent -- woah, that was a lot of syllables; what I mean is you're fucking dumb -- to use reason and logic and language to undermine my stated opinion and change the tenor of the discussion with respect to same. Meanwhile, Brooks was the one person who had the ability or willingness to do just that on this thread. If this was how every thread went, I wouldn't be here. And you all would be here on your own, salivating over athletes who won the physiological lottery but are unexceptional in every other sense.