cestmoi wrote:
....but NOT attending a for-profit company's event in that state is NOT a protest to XYZ issue.
I disagree. Governments get a lot of taxes from athletes or spectators who travel for events like this. Money is politics.
WTC is in a tough spot and this seems like a good way to handle it.
Employees of many large companies expect their employers to have non-discriminatory policies in place, to be inclusive. Companies often come to the conclusion that being inclusive results in a more capable work force (because there are very talented people in every social category, so all should be pursued)
I suspect WTC would like to do something in protest, as many other companies have done, in support of their employees, but also want to support the athletes who have a variety of opinions and goals and with whom they also want to preserve a long-term relationship.
Giving athletes a choice accomplishes both tasks.
"If everything seems in control, you aren't going fast enough" -- Mario Andretti