Triathlon Forum
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [Learn]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [mckenzie]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [Paulo]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [Mito Chondria]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [JohnA]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [mckenzie]
[ In reply to ]
Lactic acid never exists in vivo.
This is only true at exercise intensities >100% of VO2max.
Lactate is produced from pyruvate, i.e., it never exists in the protonated form. The H+ produced during non-aerobic glycolysis are due to reactions further up the pathway.
This is correct.
CO2 is actually a fairly weak stimulus to ventilation during exercise (which probably explains why Wasserman's theory proved incorrect).
Only if you first assume that CO2 is the most important determinant of ventilation during exercise. As it turns out, it isn't, such that ventilatory threshold and lactate threshold can be dissociated in a variety of ways (e.g., glycogen depletion/loading, very fast vs. very slow cadence, steady-state vs. interval training), even in normal individuals.
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [mckenzie]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Testing for LT - Breath analysis or finger prick [Andrew Coggan]
[ In reply to ]
Man, this is like talking to my advisor. I guess this is why I'm still in school.
mckenzie
mckenzie
Right. Which is why I said 'Given that Wiki is not perfect, I posted here so you could point out that it is either inaccurate or flat-out wrong. ' Wiki can be correct in many cases or incorrect. It more often than not is correct - more so than Brittanica.
And in faireness, it isn't just wiki, either. Many other university websites are saying exactly the same thing.
It does seems you did answer my first question: which of the two methods is superior with some good explanation as to why ventilatory can be dissociated with lactate.
For the purposes of associating LT with HR during a test for training guidance, you suggest it will not suffice. I'm guessing you wouldn't use HR for training guidance to LT anyway (when running or biking) and would use pace or power.
And in faireness, it isn't just wiki, either. Many other university websites are saying exactly the same thing.
It does seems you did answer my first question: which of the two methods is superior with some good explanation as to why ventilatory can be dissociated with lactate.
For the purposes of associating LT with HR during a test for training guidance, you suggest it will not suffice. I'm guessing you wouldn't use HR for training guidance to LT anyway (when running or biking) and would use pace or power.