In Reply To:
Are there certain roads that you will not ride on, besides highways of course, because of the danger? I read a lot about people being hit or even killed while out on a ride, sometimes on high traffic and very dangerous roadways. Which got me thinking are we being stubborn about "our cycling rights!"?
In no way am I defending the a##hole motorist that put our lives in danger, but should we be avoiding the 4 or 6 lane 50 mph city roads even though we can legally ride on them? For instance I never ride on roads without shoulders or if the posted speed limit is more then 40, very rarely country roads with a 55 mph. Also I always ride on the white line unless the side is filled with potholes. Do you take up the entire lane because its your right? Or ride on major roads with morning traffic? Curious what the ST's thoughts are on this......
In winter I eagerly anticipate riding outside, but this season I have this strange dread/fear/paranoia of being hit. I was hit(minor other than bike destruction) twice last year -- once biking and once running. Both were is low-speed limit areas with light traffic.
My qualifications for a good road(in order):
- Intersections where traffic does not backup --the start/stop seems dangerous and the cars always try to crowd me out or race me to the intersection.
- Minimal traffic
- Long stretches with minimal stop signs and stoplights
- 2-lane roads -- 4-lane roads even with sparse traffic always seems to have 2-cars driving next to each other approaching me from the rear
- Good road quality
- Roads where I see other bikers
- Lower speed limit
- Good shoulder
Usually the lower speed limit conflicts with the "long stretches".
It is impossible to ride around Chicago suburbs without risking your life on dangerous rodes for at least a portion of your ride. I try to minimize it by riding early on weekends, but my weekday afternoon rides at 4pm don't allow me avoid traffic.
Swim - Bike - Run the rest is just clothing changes.