tri_kid wrote:
spot wrote:
tri_kid wrote:
spot wrote:
tri_kid wrote:
SH wrote:
Quote:
Why do you think "communism" has failed in Venezuela, yet is going strong in China?
Ummmm... Because it's not "communism" that's going strong in China. It's pretty obvious that you don't understand economics, the history of China, and the history of Venezuela. I question if you have even read any Karl Marx. If you'd read Marx you'd at least have an idea of what projects he could remotely include as potential solutions to his criticisms of capitalism. China's new found dynamic "communism" (aka good old capitalism) isn't one of them. I don't understand economics? lol! I'm not the one that keeps referring to Venezuela as a communist country. It really shows your ignorance. In fact, Venezuela isn't even socialist in the true sense of the word. Here is a good article for you to read.
https://socialistworker.org/...sm-fail-in-venezuela Here is a good quote from the article....
"Venezuela has remained a capitalist country, through and through, despite the social achievements of the last 18 years. What has failed is not socialism, but a system that has been capitalist in its economic and political domination by a minority over the majority."
Now go back to watching CNN. Wow. Privatization of industries and a host of other things that Venezuela has done is not even remotely capitalist. The article you linked is basically devoid of any economic sense whatsoever. Google "Venezuela economic collapse" and do some reading. I tried linking some articles that did a decent job of explaining what happened to Venezuela; it would serve you well to read those before you post again.
I think you mean nationalisation of industries. Do you know the difference? I thought the article was simple enough for most people to read. You gotta keep things pretty basic on these forums or people don't even bother reading them. It also doesn't seem to make any difference what sources you use. Someone will always have an issue with them. They'll either be too liberal or too conservative. You can't win.
Yes, I meant nationalization. And I know the difference. However, given the total lack of understanding on your part about how Venezuela got to where it is, and the only article you can show to bolster your argument is the socialist workers, makes me wonder just how much you understand about economics. Or for that matter, history, or why oil prices are where they are today (hint: a lot of it has to do with Saudi Arabia trying to keep prices low enough that US oil shale is too expensive to produce).
Maybe you ought to fall back on how 9-11 was an inside job. That was at least entertaining.
I think anyone who claims to know about economics wouldn't make that mistake because its a pretty big one. In fact, I bet you had to look it up. Also, according to Saudi Arabia and others, its the US that now controls oil prices...
https://www.cnbc.com/...rols-oil-prices.html http://money.cnn.com/...di-arabia/index.html http://www.investopedia.com/...trols-oil-prices.asp Here are a few sources you can read. You can google "Who controls the price of oil?" if those sources aren't good enough for you. Also, regarding 9/11, over half of Americans believe it was an inside job , including Trump who I believe you voted for? I think the days of trying to insult someone about 9/11 are long gone. Maybe you should switch to insulting the flat earthers, Sandy Hook, or Benghazi.
http://www.ocweekly.com/...u-fear-study-7625813 Sigh. It was a simple typing mistake. Didn't have to look it up, but nice try. About oil, yes the US is gaining some control back, but if you actually read the entire third article you posted, you'll note that they say the US MAY gain more control back over price. Hasn't happened yet.
ETA: Here's a good article:
http://money.cnn.com/...ces-slump/index.html "OPEC could reverse course and increase production in an effort to squeeze U.S. producers out of the market.
"If they decide not to extend cuts and ramp production back up we would probably see prices fall," said Tom Pugh, commodities economist at Capital Economics.
Pugh said that such a strategy would surprise investors, and send prices below $40.
The strategy, however, failed miserably the last time it was tried by the Saudi-led cartel. The group pumped without concern for price starting in 2014, and U.S. producers did idle operations."
And no, trying to insult someone over 9/11 are not long gone; and I could care less how many people believe it was an inside job; to believe in that is to show just how deluded someone can be. The evidence against it being an inside job is overwhelming.
No, I didn't vote for Trump; made that very clear on this forum.
This is so typical of a thread with you...you make ludicrous assertions, then when people call you on it, you start changing the subject. Let's see, where did this start? Oh yes, sanctions ruined Venezuela's economy. Sanctions on a grand total of 7 people. Wow, they must be big spenders.
___________________________________________________
Taco cat spelled backwards is....taco cat.