JSA wrote:
windywave wrote:
JSA wrote:
windywave wrote:
JSA wrote:
windywave wrote:
This is for both you and Slowguy. I fundamentally disagree with the fact that inciting terrorist attacks is just advocating an unpopular view. There is a line. Whether it should be punished or silenced is a different discussion entirely, but to term it as an unpopular view is moronic IMO.
Rarely, if ever, do guys who carry out attacks like this incite terrorist attacks. They are the sheep who carry out the attacks, not the ring leaders.
no shit. . . . My beef is with the "holy" men inciting this garbage.
Neither slowguy nor I are talking about the people who do the inciting. We are both talking about those who carry out the attacks, who are known to frequent websites that promote the attacks, but have done nothing illegal until the attacks are carried out.
Technically they have broken the law when they've taken an affirmative action towards the crime. They should indict the radical preachers as co-conspirators
No they haven't. If I plan a bank robbery, scope it out, obtain all the supplies, drive to the bank, then change my mind and do not follow through, I have committed no crime.
If you're working with someone you have