Sounds good to me!

---

DFL > DNF > DNS

quite a high calibre weapon she's got there

Damn! If she got pulled over by police and asked if she had any weapons on her , I think she'd have to say yes.

Misunderstood instructions. Showed up with a chicken.

---

---

---

Take a short break from ST and read my blog:
http://tri-banter.blogspot.com/

for more ideas and elaborate species demonstration please visit this link:
http://phallus.is/en/

While I have no problem with people walking around with dildo's in their hands...did I miss the part in the article where they made the connection between dildo's and guns or is the fact that cock rhymes with glocks the extent of the connection?

I mean usually there's a connection, "Brownies not Bombs", is a play on "When education has all the resources they need and national defense needs to hold a bake sale..." I get that. I don't see the cocks not glocks...or didn't see it in the article.

If it's just the fact that glocks rhymes with cocks...really this is the level of thinking our "Best and brightest" are coming up with these days?

~Matt

'Cocks not Glocks' = Don't shoot, rape instead.

---

Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.

- Chinese proverb

I think you missed it, in that dildos are an example of items too obscene to openly carry in Texas but guns aren't

Not that I think dildos are too obscene to carry openly, but how would a rifle or pistol be obscene in any way?

Btw, I'm not an open carry advocate...

---

Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.

- Chinese proverb

At least the girl in the purple shirt isn't wearing yoga pants...

---

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR

I think you missed it, in that dildos are an example of items too obscene to openly carry in Texas but guns aren't

While I missed that it still makes no sense. The slogan is "Cocks, not glocks"...so everyone should carry dildos instead of guns? How about "We can't walk around with our cock out so why do you get to keep your glock out?"...too long for the poster? At least that makes sense. "Brownies not bombs" makes sense because it represents the idea that we want defense to have to have brownies rather then bombs. In this case no one really wants people to walk around with their cocks out...well I'm sure some do but that is beside the point.

It's a stupid slogan.

~Matt

'Cocks not Glocks' = Don't shoot, rape instead.

or "Cocks not Glocks" = Rather then carrying a gun walk around with your dick out.

"No cocks no glocks" makes more sense but then you wouldn't be able to walk around with a dildo in your hand.

~Matt

I don't know if you've ever heard this criticism before, but let me kindly suggest something, you are overthinking this.

I don't know if you've ever heard this criticism before, but let me kindly suggest something, you are overthinking this.

Pretty easy to do when no thought was put into the statement :-)

For me it looks like a "Hey let's make an excuse to do something outrageous like play with dildo's in public" rather then a realistic attempt to protest guns on campus. I expect better from college campuses...maybe that was my first mistake.

Honestly the whole thing comes across to me like "Heehhhh heeee we made a ryhme that has cocks in it....heee haaaa...look a dildo". If this was an 8th grade protest I could see it, college...really?

~Matt

Have you heard about "Safe Spaces"? :-)

For me it looks like a "Hey let's make an excuse to do something outrageous like play with dildo's in public"

I've never got that fascination either. Do the people who do that really think they are going to get a lot of support for doing it?

I figured this would be about a different thing...

---

_____________________________________
You're not stuck in traffic. You ARE traffic.

Do the people who do that really think they are going to get a lot of support for doing it?

I have no idea whether they are doing because they *think* they are being clever and simply have no idea what clever is or whether they just want to come up with something that will garner some level of attention. I've also met people that can't seem to connect dots and what makes sense to them doesn't necessarily make any sense. I often think this happens when people get emotionally attached to an idea and rational thought seems to go bye-bye.

In this case it went something like this. "I'm really angry about how people are allowed to carry guns for everyone to see." "Yeah me too how would they like it if I walked around with my cock hanging out?" Now at this point of the conversation most people stop and go...uhhh...WTF are you talking about. However the emotionally charged and irrational move on to "Yeah, fuck right they wouldn't like that at all." "Hey we should do that...get a bunch of dildo's and protest guns with them". "That's a great idea "Cocks not glocks"" "Man we are brilliant".

No, no, you're an idiot because you didn't stop at the second sentence of the conversation.

~Matt

1) Did I mention you are overthinking this?
2) Anyone a student on campus during the summer is a loser
3) Look up the word 'absurdity'
4) Did I mention you are overthinking this?

1) Did I mention you are overthinking this?

Maybe we could pass a little of his overthinking to those who didn't think at all, then this would all go away.

I think it is as simple as there is a law against showing dildos in public, but openly displaying a loaded firearm is acceptable. Some people find guns and the display of guns to be objectionable, but do not find sex toys to be offensive. I believe the protestors are trying to point out the absurdity of the two laws.

1) Did I mention you are overthinking this?
2) Anyone a student on campus during the summer is a loser
3) Look up the word 'absurdity'
4) Did I mention you are overthinking this?

Over thinking or simply searching for some semblance of meaning. Typically people act rationally and make decisions rationally...I'm not seeing any of that here.

Is it really as ignorant as "Me angry bout' guns" "Me run around with dildos to show anger"?

~Matt

I think it is as simple as there is a law against showing dildos in public, but openly displaying a loaded firearm is acceptable.

Are they then fighting for their "Right" to openly carry dildo's? Is this even a thing, a concern of anyone's?

Some people find guns and the display of guns to be objectionable, but do not find sex toys to be offensive. I believe the protestors are trying to point out the absurdity of the two laws.

But the statement is "Cocks not Glocks" and they are running around with dildos. I get the absurdity of it, but I highly doubt anyone is angling for the right to walk around with a dildo openly displayed. So "Cocks not glocks" is not really the slogan they are looking for.

"Boobs not Berrettas" could have been used as some want the right to walk around topless, this makes sense. I don't see a big push for people walking around with their dildos and cocks hanging out.

~Matt

I think it is why is one objectionable display allowed while the other objectionable display is not. The dildo crowd may or may not want to carry around a sex toy for easy access when the mood strikes, but they are prevented from doing that by a law. As a marketing guy, I like the slogan "Cocks not Glocks". It might not be totally on message, but it is catchy and hey, look, we are here discussing it. The protesters are going for share of mind and using a gimmick to achieve their goal.

I believe they are pointing out the absurdity of banning dildos basically because of victorian sensibilities, while allowing the open care of items that are the implement of choice in tens of thousands of deaths each year. Of course dildos aren't mentioned in the constitution as far as I know, but it does seem pretty ridiculous that carrying a dildo around is offensive enough to be banned by state law and yet, say the carnage shown in violent movies and TV shows is okay.

Wanting for something to not be banned is not the same as wanting to do that something. Many people disapprove for instance of burning the flag, but are against legally banning it. Same for say, neo Nazis. Or Burkini bans. I doubt many people want to wear one, but many who don't want to wear one would be against a law trying to ban them.

And, for the love of God, a dildo is a cock, so "Cocks, not Glocks" does make sense. I think it's no different than the open carry movement. Not every single person who supports the idea of open carry actually intends to do so. They support the right for others to do so if they choose. Same for dildos. I don't want to carry one around, but if somebody else wants to, why should I support making that illegal.

And BTW, you ARE overthinking this by a factor of about a million.

---

Kevin

http://kevinmetcalfe.dreamhosters.com
My Strava

Tits

with frickin' lasers.

---

RayGovett
Hughson CA
Be Prepared-- Strike Swiftly -- Who Dares Wins- Without warning-"it will be hard. I can do it"

 
I think that it boils down to two possibilities:

1) a cock is also a word for a male bird (usually used for a male chicken, a rooster). Therefore: they are saying no to veganism.

or the more likely scenario:

2) I would wager that most dildos are produced in China, China has a wall. Trump wants a wall along the Mexico/USA border. Therefore: Vote Trump.

Making America great again!

.

---

Once, I was fast. But I got over it.