Here's an interesting tidbit...
At the race in question, there are TTs run on both Sunday and Monday of Labor Day weekend, but only the Sunday races are typically considered for records, as that's when the promoter pays for the appropriate level officials to be there, along with USADA reps. However, the article states that JF refused a test on Sep 4, which fell on Monday.
My guess, his time on Sunday wasn't spectacular for his given category (110+ combined age), but on Monday he must've had an older partner, as they were in the 130+ category, and even though he was much slower on Monday, it was fast enough for a record in the category. He probably had no expectation of being tested on that Monday, regardless of his result, and obviously the officials and testers were onsite.
At the race in question, there are TTs run on both Sunday and Monday of Labor Day weekend, but only the Sunday races are typically considered for records, as that's when the promoter pays for the appropriate level officials to be there, along with USADA reps. However, the article states that JF refused a test on Sep 4, which fell on Monday.
My guess, his time on Sunday wasn't spectacular for his given category (110+ combined age), but on Monday he must've had an older partner, as they were in the 130+ category, and even though he was much slower on Monday, it was fast enough for a record in the category. He probably had no expectation of being tested on that Monday, regardless of his result, and obviously the officials and testers were onsite.