Duffy wrote:
Quote:
I was just guessing. I don’t know who Charlie Rose is. Even if that were true, which I doubt, the point still stands.
Why must you insist that I know who this guy is?
Half of the people in this thread have never heard of him.
Quote:
Who gives a fuck what his politics are? Or any slimeball who sexually molests, assaults or rapes women...Something that I have learned along the way that has become especially apparent in the last couple of weeks is that those who speak the loudest about how women should be protected and promoted and the ones we should watch out for the most.
It doesn’t really surprise anyone when an anti-gay politician is found to be having gay sex in secret. It doesn’t surprise me when a person promotes “womens’ rights” and loudly decrys “rape culture” who his a misogynistic fuck head in secret (and apparently sometimes not so secret).
I worked for a photographer back in the early 90s who once read me the riot act after I showed him some photos I had made of a chick that he deemed to be “degrading to women”. The photos were sexy but not even close to porn. He was really pissed at me for it.
A couple years ago I found out that he’s serving 25 years in prison for a violent rape.
And low and behold, I google Charlie Rose and find this statement....
Quote:
“In my 45 years in journalism, I have prided myself on being an advocate for the careers of the women with whom I have worked,” Rose said in a statement provided to The Post.An advocate for women who assaults women....
I'm not sure how any of that addresses my point of you trying to score political points at every turn. Seems to me your point above is that there are hypocrites on both sides of the political aisle, which supports my assertion that none of this should be political.
Last edited by:
Kay Serrar: Nov 21, 17 5:25