BarryP wrote:
Quote:
I think it has more to do with whether labor and/or organized labor identifies in lock step with a party vs historical. And I think the previous admin with war on coal etc turned labor off more to D than previous adminsBut a "war on coal" isn't a war on labor. Circle all the way back to the OP, there just aren't that many coal jobs out there.
I get that it might be perceived that way, which is what my OP was about. Why is it perceived that way? But there's a difference between being anti-labor and being incorrectly perceived as anti-labor.
we are talking in the political sense right?
Look, you can be as "right" as you want to be. I employ approx. 100 workers who are members of 5 different unions. And I am telling you your "perception" problem is translating to a vote problem