Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Wiggins didn't break the rules - but do we consider him a doper anyway? [Ralph20]
I've actually never stated he's a doper nor care to actually define him as a doper or not.

If you put up your race results, timing of TUE processes, when you didn't have a TUE but still raced, statements on your own actions of seeking an TUE then I can atleast look at the subject at hand and make more informed discussion points.


If you don't think this case brings up serious issues with gaming the system, then that's fine. We have nothing else to discuss. And I've not nor has anyone else stated that TUE= doping.

I've said that in this instance the info I have, I call BS w Wiggins. No one else but Wiggins. Eta: I should clarify I call BS on the whole situation- Wiggins, Sky, UCI.

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Last edited by: Brooks Doughtie: Sep 29, 16 9:01

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by B_Doughtie (Dawson Saddle) on Sep 29, 16 9:01