svennn wrote:
It is also in peer review now. Regardless of the funding source, doesn't passing peer review lend legitimacy?
I'll let others in research comment on that. It is quite a grey area, and above my pay grade ;-)
Regardless, it doesn't mean that laymen can't or are unable to comment on the legitimacy or relative value of the test(s) being conducted. IE why the unfasted state in the 3 hour test? Why the different substrate fuel sources pre test for different groups? Why at rest does the HC group have substrate utilization equal to 70-80% (or more) of FTP?
EDIT: also looks like blood lactate is spiking in the LC group vs stable in the HC group, I wonder what would happen at 6-9-12 hours vs 3?
Maurice
Last edited by:
mauricemaher: Nov 18, 15 14:11