Steve Irwin wrote:
RChung wrote:
KR Bickel wrote:
Field testing will get you reliable data to maybe 0.05 +/- CdA differentiation, under the best conditions with a good protocol.
Woah. That's not very good.
Even 0.005 m^2 isn't that good:
http://www.trainingandracingwithapowermeter.com/...aerodynamicists.html
Last edited by:
Andrew Coggan: Jun 3, 15 18:09