Slowman wrote:
i got the sense that this was all recent. USAC said that it wasn't the GB that gave the okay to george weeks or months ago.If USAC wasn't the GB, and it appears that the UCI didn't know squat until the end, than that leads you back to USADA. But USADA was giving pressure to USA Cycling top relook at the item? Something is not fully adding up- but that doesn't surpise me with this entire cast of characters involved. Or Hincapie is jawboning without a leg to stand on- meaning he didn't actually get approval.