>Maybe so, BUT, he did it in a sport that everyone was doing it and everyone is still doing it today.
>it's not fair to judge or speculate.
I'm not sure how you reconcile these two claims. That vast majority of pro cyclists have never tested positive for anything, and you judge/speculate that every single one of them is a doper. Then you say it's not fair to do the same to an admitted doper? (he didn't just test positive, but admitted to EPO use).
>it's not fair to judge or speculate.
I'm not sure how you reconcile these two claims. That vast majority of pro cyclists have never tested positive for anything, and you judge/speculate that every single one of them is a doper. Then you say it's not fair to do the same to an admitted doper? (he didn't just test positive, but admitted to EPO use).