Here we have an issue where it's not black or white, and you want to portray it that way.

There's a lot of gray in every every facet of life.

I've already stated what rules are morally just in this thread (in my opinion). This one simply isn't so.

Knowing that when you race you feel the product is virtually damaged because of bandits and not by a flawed organizers decision to not protect you from all circumstances sounds like your own issue.

I don't condone drafting, and the USADA should go back to be an organization based in science (spend their money improving their testing) and not let cavalier attorneys instead waste those taxpayer dollars chasing trophies based on personal vendettas and public career building agendas.

Good try on trying to summarize my past posts into one sentence coffin nails. If I was in your shoes I might feel it's time to rely on things other than the merits of this debate to save face as well. Your moral high ground is clouded by the greed of a business and your last effort is to blame bandits for "hypothetical product damage."