Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Independent Wind Tunnel Testing....ok I'll do it! [sharad]
In Reply To:
Disagree on a universal fork. I designed the 4000 and the Airfoil fork to work directly with the frame.
I agree entirely with this comment. There are some components that few people seem to change and the forks are one of them.

In Reply To:
To get fair data, the complete bike as presented to the customer should be tested, and really a rider should be in place to see how the complete unit (bike and rider) work together.
I don't really agree with this comment though, but there is no correct way to test a bike and as such, testing should be representative of what people want to know. For me this comes down to the question of what most people, who want to see this data, buy; F&F (plus trimmings) or complete bike. If it's the first answer, then you need to standardise components.

I think that the idea of testing with a person is a really bad one though; it's just a source of inaccuracy.

edit - you didn't run your tests with a rider and then calculate him out did you?
Last edited by: zebragonzo: Oct 31, 09 17:27

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by zebragonzo (Lightning Ridge) on Oct 31, 09 15:24
  • Post edited by zebragonzo (Lightning Ridge) on Oct 31, 09 15:26
  • Post edited by zebragonzo (Lightning Ridge) on Oct 31, 09 15:30
  • Post edited by zebragonzo (Lightning Ridge) on Oct 31, 09 15:31
  • Post edited by zebragonzo (Lightning Ridge) on Oct 31, 09 17:27