In Reply To:
In Reply To:
If Carlos liked them, good for him. Most pros don't. He's not sponsored by them so he stripped the decals. No big deal. Do you really think they are all that helpful, compared with, say, intervals? But hey, I don't train with a power meter either because I think perceived exertion has been working just fine. I do have a lactate and heart rate monitors, though.
That's a ridiculous question, really. As Justin said, what in the world would prevent you from doing intervals with QRings? I'm sure that wasn't the point of your question though...so here's an attempt to answer what I think you may have been asking. QRings allowed me to continue riding by helping reduce the strain on my right patellar tendon. Since then I've done tons of intervals and increased my FTP from ~235W to ~315W, my 6x4min power from ~290W to ~375W and my 40k TT speed to 26.1mph. All on QRings with pedal forces far in excess of what caused serious tendonitis before the QRings. So in my estimation they work great.
How do you know your tendonitis wouldn't have gotten better on its own? Tendonitis on the bike is usually doing too much too soon. In any case, I wasn't arguing against them for any possible health or rehab benefits they may offer. I think it's great if they helped your patellar tendonitis. On the other hand, if you had patellar tendonitis when riding, you may have also benefited from some other form of rehab. Now you are apparently dependent on Q-rings; i.e., they have become an orthosis for you. Without them, you claim, you get tendonitis. You have a Q-ring dependency, possibly.
How do you know your wattage and TT performances weren't due to doing intervals alone? What was your control group? Right, rhetorical question (again). I guess if I were you I'd keep using them. I think they offer little benefit for MOST people, however.
__________________________________________________
I love France. I just hate Toulouse. I'd really hate to lose le Trek.