You're wrong, or maybe right, but just the last week being a case in point, with three bombshell! blockbuster! stories that would be bad for the Trump team, quickly proven false. The reportage of Trump reminds me of reporting after Trayvon Martin was killed, and how multiple networks made major reporting errors in the days afterward. IMO, It belies an agenda, or at the least the inability to control their disdain/dislike for the man, which they have every right and reason to feel (just as those at the FBI do). Problem is we need these people to do their jobs dispassionately, so they can maintain some level of credibility. All that is to make the case that calling out TDS actually has value...though if we point it out in a Canadian, it's just for fun. ;)
-
-
"Brian Ross’ disaster of a bombshell report that Michael Flynn was prepared to testify that he had been instructed by candidate Donald Trump to open contacts with Russian officials eager to meddle in the election. Later that day, Mr. Ross corrected himself, conceding that it was shortly after the election that the directive was issued. Big difference. He was taken off the beat for four weeks and the president will be off-limits to him.
Reuters and Bloomberg had to correct their dispatches that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed President Trump’s personal bank records after The Wall Street Journal reported the subpoenas were for “people or entities affiliated” with the president. Not quite the same thing.
CNN, CBS, and MSNBC all breathlessly reported they had discovered an email that proved the Trump campaign got an advance look at emails hacked by WikiLeaks. The story fell apart when it “emerged,” as the London papers typically put it, that the networks got the date of the email wrong, and it was old fake news when the president first saw it."
-
https://www.washingtontimes.com/...emely-horrible-week/