klehner wrote:
stal wrote:
OneGoodLeg wrote:
OK, but just put on your magic Carnac hat & cape and try to surmise where on the spectrum between those 2 poles he was treading for it to warrant resignation... Do you *really* think he was only casually mentioning surrogacy as an abstract concept, or is it far more likely he moved on to proposing how the conception was to be administered?I don't know what to think. All I know is what I said, that discussing surrogacy is perfectly normal.
Saying that it's 'weird' to discuss it in the workplace is about as draconian as folks who won't let women nurse in the workplace.
I'm sure your imagination is running wild because he's a republican so you want to assume he's a vicious predator (like conyers) but let's wait until we know more.
You must know that just discussing *the topic* of surrogacy would never be the cause of a sitting Congresscritter's resignation. Either he persisted in going into intimate details to the point of causing discomfort in the staffers, or he discussed the mechanics of him doing it with the staffers.
What's weird is talking with staffers about *them* doing the surrogacy for their boss.
(At least my wife's boss waited for her to leave their company before asking us about it!)
To be fair...no, we don't know that he persisted or discussed the mechanics. We don't know anything other than he admits to discussing surrogacy.
That's the problem with "guilty by allegation" these days.
NB: I'm totally not defending this guy...just due process.
----------------------------------------------------------------
My training