H- wrote:
Quote:
I pointed out some obvious red flags in the Trump campaign, all of which have led to Mueller's appointment.
Fair enough, I have not fully perused the other threads on the subject and am not familiar with your posts on the subject. But did you identify crimes, as you ask here, or did you identify red flags?
Quote:
Please do the same for your side. Thanks in advance.
Not much time right now so this will be quick.
Here is one Fusion red flag: DNC paying money for information obtained from Russian intelligence officials for the purpose of influencing the US election.
What color is this flag: John Podesta testifying to Congress that he had no knowledge of DNC paying for dossier, yet sitting next to him was the DNC lawyer that paid for the dossier.
Is it really your position that GPS/Fusion raises no red flags?
The claim was that "egregious" crimes were committed by HRC/DNC wrt Fusion GPS that warranted a full investigation, up to and including a special prosecutor. It's up to those making that claim to provide *some* justification for all this attention.
Re "influencing the US election": isn't that the point of opposition research, to gather potentially harmful information that can be used against your political foes? There's a difference between paying for opposition research that you will use in a campaign, and colluding with a foreign (and hostile) government for *them* to influence the election.
If Podesta perjured himself before Congress (assuming he was under oath), he should be prosecuted. Again: paying for the opposition research isn't a crime, even if it was done by a "foreign national."
(as an aside: did you note that it was that infamous liberal rag, the Washington Post, that broke the story about the DNC paying Fusion for the work that resulted in the dossier? When was the last time you heard, say, Fox even mention any Trump scandals, much less actually investigate said concerns?)
----------------------------------
"Go yell at an M&M"