j p o wrote:
The Sessions thing is weird. Not sure why he isn't firing him. There has to be more to that story.
one speculation i've heard is that firing him would lop this onto the pile of deeds that accrue to obstruction of justice (were that charge to be sought). but i think haranguing him into leaving is a distinction without a difference - this still ends up on that pile.
to me, there is a nexus with matthew 25:40, which says as you will remember, "'truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.'"
it's vicarious acts i'm talking about. to me, that's what comes to mind. not just when you act indifferently to someone in need, you act indifferently to him or to anyone. also (to me) when somebody else acts badly and you act indifferently, that bad act accrues to you, as in edmund burke's "good men [who] do nothing."
i would never treat an employee the way sessions is treated, and i'm no sessions fan. this speaks not only to the kind of employer trump is, but the kind of man he is. there are no more anecdotes from ivanka about the nice way he treats employees that will any longer work. that currency is gone.
it is highly offensive to me as an employer, as a man, as an american, as a human, to see one person humiliate another, especially someone in one's employ, especially in public. this one ranks right up there as among the vilest things i've seen trump do.
but it's gotten to the point now where i'm also watching others who are in a position of power and who are doing nothing. if i'm sessions i just got a really good lesson in what matters to folks you thought were your friends, and that lesson is the gift that's going to keep on giving for awhile.
Dan Empfield
aka Slowman