Swim Bike Run
Slowtwitch.com
  • Login >
Slowtwitch.com
Search menu
Hot Forum Topics

Poll

Comfort While Cycling
How much does comfort while cycling influence your overall race performance?
View Results


Home > Forum > Lavender Room > Hillary would still lose?

Lavender Room

Back To ForumPrint Thread

Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Tri
Classifieds
Lavender
Jobs
Notices
Hillary would still lose?
Quote | Reply
windywave
Apr 23, 17 10:51
Post #1 of 10 (1012 views)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/...m_term=.3a42e307a924


Quote:
Asked how they would vote if the election were held today, 43 say they would support Trump and 40 percent say Clinton.
The big takeaway is not Clinton people would vote for Trump, but that they would vote for a third party.


Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
racin_rusty
Apr 23, 17 11:04
Post #2 of 10 (996 views)
I think the biggest takeaway is that from a strictly American point of view Trump hasn't been nearly as horrible as the media cried wolf about. From a Canadian point of view however, the guy isn't exactly a bouquet of roses, more like a hammer looking for a nail.
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [racin_rusty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Velocibuddha
Apr 23, 17 11:59
Post #3 of 10 (943 views)
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Actually quite the opposite.
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [Velocibuddha] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
iBot
Apr 23, 17 12:13
Post #4 of 10 (927 views)
Velocibuddha wrote:
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Actually quite the opposite.

Bing!
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Uncle Arqyle
Apr 23, 17 12:14
Post #5 of 10 (927 views)
windywave wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nearing-100-days-trumps-approval-at-record-lows-but-his-base-is-holding/2017/04/22/a513a466-26b4-11e7-b503-9d616bd5a305_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_poll-1202am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.3a42e307a924


Quote:
Asked how they would vote if the election were held today, 43 say they would support Trump and 40 percent say Clinton.
The big takeaway is not Clinton people would vote for Trump, but that they would vote for a third party.


Once a misogynist always a misogynist.
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [Velocibuddha] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sanuk
Apr 23, 17 13:25
Post #6 of 10 (884 views)
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Where would Bob Dole, Walter Mondale or George McGovern fit on your list?

As Presidential candidates, they weren't too great either.

Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [Velocibuddha] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Uncle Arqyle
Apr 23, 17 14:21
Post #7 of 10 (843 views)
Velocibuddha wrote:
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Actually quite the opposite.

Well, one would think the second worst candidate is more popular than the worst candidate - especially after the worst candidate has been governing.
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [Uncle Arqyle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dave_w
Apr 23, 17 14:45
Post #8 of 10 (830 views)
Uncle Arqyle wrote:
Velocibuddha wrote:
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Actually quite the opposite.


Well, one would think the second worst candidate is more popular than the worst candidate - especially after the worst candidate has been governing.
-
So you're saying Hillary is the worst ever.
Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [Sanuk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
EndlessH2O
Apr 23, 17 15:25
Post #9 of 10 (804 views)
Sanuk wrote:
Hillary was the second worst candidate ever to run for president for a major American party.

Just because the worst candidate ever actually won, it doesn't make Clinton more popular.

Where would Bob Dole, Walter Mondale or George McGovern fit on your list?

As Presidential candidates, they weren't too great either.


And this guy too.



Quote Reply
Re: Hillary would still lose? [windywave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
iBot
Apr 23, 17 15:58
Post #10 of 10 (782 views)
Hillary: Bad candidate. Worse campaigner.

Trump: Bad candidate. Huge campaigner. Maybe the best ever.
Quote Reply
Back To ForumPrint Thread

Our Partners

transition-DOT-area-AT-slowtwitch-DOT-com

Advertise with us

©1999-2024 Slowtwitch, Inc., and Slowtwitch.com
Reproduction of material from any Slowtwitch.com page
without written permission is strictly prohibited.