Rodred wrote:
Not true. It was modified several times but was still unacceptable. Sixty plus days in and we are going to claim this is some sort or monumental defeat because some good people stood up against some bad people and said "NO" while trying to fix something that was meant to be devastating and hard to get kill? Tough crowd. The reason for this being described as a monumental loss is right there in your statement. Contrary to your claim, we are actually
twothousandfivehundredfiftyfive plus days in on this issue (7 years x 365 for rough math). The fact that there is
no viable replacement plan whatsoever is a staggering fiasco.
Many of us knew it all along but it should be getting pretty clear to the holdouts and perhaps eventually to the dumb masses at large as well - the repeal and replace platform is a giant political bait and switch (lie, for the truly dense among us). Obamacare is the conservative solution already and it doesn't work because the conservative solution never meant to cover everyone affordably.
We can man up and own the ideology by admitting that we do indeed want the poor to die from preventable causes (and pay for it via increased costs to the system). Or we can man up and admit that a plan that hopes a bunch of private interests will redistribute the costs (which we are not willing to control) equitably is a shitty system.
Your argument that the Dems still own this is shitty too. Yeah, they own Obamacare...so? The Pubs own the decision to do nothing about it and let the "unbearable suffering" that they've been milking for election after election for 7 years continue. I'm not sure if that's getting through to the hardcore supporters yet so I'll try another one. The Dems lit the house on fire. The Pubs are standing at the curb with a working fire truck looking at the flames.