AlanShearer wrote:
Not overthinking it. Just because it's simple in your experience doesn't mean that's always the case.
Vitus says this is what happens in the private sector all the time -- that companies easily and often draw distinct lines that are easy to follow, all the time, without exception. Yet that's not true. Can't tell you the number of times I've been told, "I'm going to be out of town, so send it to this email address." Or something to that effect.
And yes, you might restrict your personal email to just family and close friends, but not everyone does. This is especially true for high level public officials, who have all kinds of contacts. It gets even more complicated when there are state and local laws prohibiting the use of public resources for the conduct of political activities. So they can't use the gov't email for that, they can either use a separate political account, or their own personal email. And that's often where things get blurred, as there isn't always a solid line between official business and political activities, and even when there is, the players often are on both sides of that line.
I don't think there is really an argument about the one offs (at least from me). It is the routine use that boggles my mind. I'm not sure we know how much Pence used his, but we know about Clinton.
The routine use of non-government email for government business is what drives people nuts.
I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.