Purchased a home in Fall City WA.
Home is located on 5+ acres with a fantastic view of the snoqualmie valley and the cascade mountain range. During a casual conversation with our landscaper about 6 months after moving in he mentioned that it was illegal for him to trim/top the trees that have the potential to permanently block our view, thus decreasing the potential value of the property. He said that the previous owners had removed some trees and were fined by the county government and forced to replace the trees they cut down. He said that the county had designated our property as a sensitive area which means that we are expressly forbidden from clearing any part of our property.
The question is do we have a cause of action against any or all of the following:
1). Our real estate agent who did not do his due diligence as the information was readily available during a public records check. He was supposed to be acting in our best interest as our local representative who is supposed to be aware that sensitive areas exist and that our property was subject to such regulation.
2). Seller for not disclosing such a declaration that they clearly were aware of.
3). Sellers agent for not disclosing the designation.
Thanks for the responses, both real and sarcastic.
Home is located on 5+ acres with a fantastic view of the snoqualmie valley and the cascade mountain range. During a casual conversation with our landscaper about 6 months after moving in he mentioned that it was illegal for him to trim/top the trees that have the potential to permanently block our view, thus decreasing the potential value of the property. He said that the previous owners had removed some trees and were fined by the county government and forced to replace the trees they cut down. He said that the county had designated our property as a sensitive area which means that we are expressly forbidden from clearing any part of our property.
The question is do we have a cause of action against any or all of the following:
1). Our real estate agent who did not do his due diligence as the information was readily available during a public records check. He was supposed to be acting in our best interest as our local representative who is supposed to be aware that sensitive areas exist and that our property was subject to such regulation.
2). Seller for not disclosing such a declaration that they clearly were aware of.
3). Sellers agent for not disclosing the designation.
Thanks for the responses, both real and sarcastic.