mopdahl wrote:
JSA wrote:
mopdahl wrote:
I'll skip past the personal insults & usual JSA insinuating other's positions I'm not insinuating anything. I am pointing out what everyone knows to be true.
mopdahl wrote:
(I've never commented on Voter ID laws, and for the record, I don't hate the 2nd Amendment....but where in it does it give citizens the right to own whatever arms they like? (and we both know this is simply/eventually going to come down to a court's definition of what "infringe" is or isn't)), and go straight to your final statement: Therefore, I know that, deep inside that political hack brain of yours, you know damn good and well that these laws are not intended to stop mass shootings and other criminal activity and will do nothing to stop said contact. They are aimed at and will effect law abiding citizens. That's all. Will these laws stop mass shootings? Not tomorrow. Not next year. Maybe not for 50 years. But eventually, given enough financial or penal disincentive, they may help.
No, it won't. You know it won't. Everyone knows it won't. But, that isn't the goal, so all is well.
Just like the goal of ObamaCare was never, ever to make healthcare affordable. Everyone knows that.
Again, you like to pick and choose which Constitutional Rights should be protected and which should not. You want voting without ID. You want due process hearings for enemy combatants. You want racial profiling outlawed. You pick and choose.
That's fine. That's your right to do. But it makes it really difficult to take you seriously.
Once we start giving up rights, any rights, then we need to be prepared to give them all up. Are you ready for that?
I was wrong on your insinuation of other people's positions. Your strategy is much simpler than that: you simply make shit up & then randomly assign it as your opponent's belief and argue against that rather than what has been stated. If you are going to do that, why don't you just look into the mirror and argue with yourself?
I'm 99.9% sure that I've never stated a position on any of the above "wants" you've assigned to me. But apparently in your mind, everyone knows them to be true. I'm not sure how to have an intelligent discussion with someone whose internal surety of belief is only eclipsed by their absolute disregard for factual evidence. Gurudriver has already filled that position here in the LR.
All I can go on is what you have posted. You haven't responded to a single question I have asked because you do not have a response. You came in here, took a shot at Duffy, missed miserably, and tried to change the subject.
So, let's see whether you have the ability to respond to my points or you just slink back under your rock.
I think we all know what you will do ...
Which is why no one here takes you seriously.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR