slowguy wrote:
That would apply to forums and comment sections, right, but what if Dan had posted a link to one of the news articles about her, or put the entirety of one of those articles on the site? He is quoted in those articles as well. Not sure if that would change the argument. It's a different level of interaction on Dan's part than simply hosting a site where some people said somethings.
NOTE: NO LEGAL ADVICE IS BEING GIVEN AND I AM NOT COMMENTING ON DAN'S LEGAL LIABILITY. THIS IS JUST FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES.
Correct regarding the forums and comment section.
Let's assume Dan was not quoted in the articles. If he merely put a link to the articles on ST or copied the articles on ST, and that's all he did, it would be tough to argue Dan is liable for anything.
Dan was quoted in the articles. So, Dan is potentially liable for anything he said in those articles. Assume he said something that was knowingly false, then linked ST to those articles, it could be used to increase his liability b/c now he is not just speaking to one news outlet, but spreading those comments via his own website. I don't know the legal form of ST, but assume it is an Inc or LLP, etc. That act could go from making Dan individual liable to making ST liable.
NOTE: SORRY FOR BEING REDUNDANT AND HYPER-SENSITIVE, BUT AGAIN, TO BE CLEAR, NO LEGAL ADVICE IS BEING GIVEN AND I AM NOT COMMENTING ON DAN'S LEGAL LIABILITY. THIS IS JUST FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR