Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Turning capitalism on its head
Quote | Reply
I reminded myself of a quote in another thread:

"The area of production should be as far as possible coterminous with the area of consumption. The utilitarians were wrong in saying that "things should be produced where they can be most economically produced". The true principle is: things should be produced where they can be most economically consumed." - Fr. Vincent McNabb

I heard about three or four minutes of some lefty, pinko, Marxist* farmer on NPR the other day who's apparently been saying the same thing. (Didn't get to listen long enough to catch his name- Ken?) Sounded pretty good, up until he got to the part about not drinking coffee. That's just crazy talk. Otherwise, I thought he was talking good common sense.

What d'ya think?



(*- No offense meant, just a joke. For all I know, the farmer on NPR was only a scum-sucking, liberal Democrat. And anyway, I'm agreeing with him, so don't go getting your sensibilities all in a knot.)








"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [vitus979] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The cost paid by the ultimate consumer is the determinant factor in any decision to buy. Since the seller has to cost the price of getting goods to market into his selling price, he really has to look at the cost to consume, not produce. For example, if I am comparing TV sets, the one I will buy (given equal quality) is the one on sale where I can obtain it (be that at a store or online) at the lowest cost to me. If Set A is produced in Mexico at a lower cost than Set B made in the US, but transportation costs actually make it cost more at the point of sale, then I will buy Set B. If, with transportation costs included, Set A is still cheaper than Set B, I will buy Set A.

The problem arises when tariffs, embargoes, import fees, price supports and other protectionist devices are artificially inserted into the economic decision-making process (farmers love these, BTW). These allow non-economical (whether measured by production or consumption costs) industries to endure when they really shouldn't.

I am from a Kansas farm family and married into a Florida farm family. Farmers love to complain about the "gummint" interfering with their lives, but they also love them subsidies.
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [tri_bri2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am from a Kansas farm family and married into a Florida farm family. Farmers love to complain about the "gummint" interfering with their lives, but they also love them subsidies.[/reply]

----
Old joke:
Q: What's a farmer's least favorite month?



A: February, because there's only 28 days to complain. :-)


Josef
-------
blog
Quote Reply
Post deleted by martin [ In reply to ]
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [martin] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
those who actually did read 'das kapital' thought it made a lot of sense.

Hoo boy. Now you think I'm a Marxist myself? Whiplash city, baby. ;)

What's proposed by McNabb, and whoever this farmer dude is, is most definitely not Marxism, or socialism, or anything of the sort. (C'mon Ken, help me out here- who's that farmer?)

And while capitalism as actually practiced does exploit many (low) tendencies of human nature, it's hardly a human inevitability.








"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [vitus979] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I wouldn't say "capitalism as actually practiced does exploit many (low) tendencies of human nature," I would say "many people susceptible to the low tendencies of human nature exploit capitalism."

Kind of like the argument about guns killing people vs. people killing people.
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [tri_bri2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pure capitalism doesn't just exploit certain tendencies, it is fundamentally built on some of the lowest human motivators; greed and vanity.
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [adamb] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
Pure capitalism doesn't just exploit certain tendencies, it is fundamentally built on some of the lowest human motivators; greed and vanity.
Back this statement up and cite real references...
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [vitus979] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
those who actually did read 'das kapital' thought it made a lot of sense.

Hoo boy. Now you think I'm a Marxist myself? Whiplash city, baby. ;)

What's proposed by McNabb, and whoever this farmer dude is, is most definitely not Marxism, or socialism, or anything of the sort. (C'mon Ken, help me out here- who's that farmer?)

And while capitalism as actually practiced does exploit many (low) tendencies of human nature, it's hardly a human inevitability.


What, you think I listen to NPR 24/7? I get to hear it during my commute to/from work, is all. And I now work all of 5 miles from home.

I also listen to the puzzle on Sunday mornings, of course.

----------------------------------
"Go yell at an M&M"
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [klehner] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
[reply]Back this statement up and cite real references...[/reply]

Ok, let's quote the father of capitalism, Adam Smith!

[i]Every individual endeavours to employ his capital so that its produce may be of the greatest value. He generally neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. He intends only his own security, only his own gain. And he is in this led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than he really intends to promote it.[/i]

Trickle down. Look out for #1 at all turns and Capitalist Jesus will make sure everyone else doesn't die.
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [vitus979] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
I reminded myself of a quote in another thread:

"The area of production should be as far as possible coterminous with the area of consumption. The utilitarians were wrong in saying that "things should be produced where they can be most economically produced". The true principle is: things should be produced where they can be most economically consumed." - Fr. Vincent McNabb

I heard about three or four minutes of some lefty, pinko, Marxist* farmer on NPR the other day who's apparently been saying the same thing. (Didn't get to listen long enough to catch his name- Ken?) Sounded pretty good, up until he got to the part about not drinking coffee. That's just crazy talk. Otherwise, I thought he was talking good common sense.

What d'ya think?



(*- No offense meant, just a joke. For all I know, the farmer on NPR was only a scum-sucking, liberal Democrat. And anyway, I'm agreeing with him, so don't go getting your sensibilities all in a knot.)




This is far more complicated than you think. Washington Apples/Florida Oranges are famous -- and a farmer can make more shipping them elsewhere than selling at "home".

You would think California Wine and Hawaiian Coffee and Hawaiian Pineapples would be the same, But tourism changes things.

Never mind -- I have to get to work, this is too long to explain.

Let's just say that there are many marketing factors that influence economic structure as well as manufacturing and shipping factors.
Quote Reply
Re: Turning capitalism on its head [klehner] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What, you think I listen to NPR 24/7? I get to hear it during my commute to/from work, is all.

Dang. There goes another cherished illusion up in smoke. ;)

Anyway, doesn't anybody know the name of this guy? He's been around for awhile, apparently.








"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
Quote Reply