FatandSlow wrote:
Someone recently posted an old Zipp time savings chart in another thread - I just can't remember which one. The chart showed the 1080 being faster than the original 808. iirc, the 1080 was discontinued because the 808 Firecrest was its equal (or better?).Yeah the firecrest 8-8 is quicker, if there' not much in it, I guess go for the 1080 then?
A previous post I just found:
zipp marketing literature claims, on average, the 808FC pair saves 96 seconds over 40k. the 1080 pair saves 90 seconds for the same distance.