Loosing battle.
"forum content is at the discretion of forum administrators".
It has been made clear, that dissent contributions are not appreciated..
okay, so you're out. thanks. for those who're out, not necessary to respond. maybe start another thread. only interested in those who creative, intelligent ideas on such a project.
You're being a dick. You asked, "do you think we could generate good statistics? what questions, limits, rules, processes, behaviors, cautions, have i not thought of? "
But you don't want questions or limitations. You want yes-men.
Have fun.
And don't try to play the death-card on me. I've watched cyclists, on the ground, in front of me.
"forum content is at the discretion of forum administrators".
It has been made clear, that dissent contributions are not appreciated..
trail wrote:
Slowman wrote:
"There are too many local variables. Your skill as a rider, and what type of riding you do. Where you ride. When you ride... It's sort of like heart attack risk. We have good numbers for average. But # may be way, way, off for *you*." okay, so you're out. thanks. for those who're out, not necessary to respond. maybe start another thread. only interested in those who creative, intelligent ideas on such a project.
You're being a dick. You asked, "do you think we could generate good statistics? what questions, limits, rules, processes, behaviors, cautions, have i not thought of? "
But you don't want questions or limitations. You want yes-men.
Have fun.
And don't try to play the death-card on me. I've watched cyclists, on the ground, in front of me.
Last edited by:
windschatten: Aug 27, 16 22:05