Your comments are beyond my level of knowledge of her theories.

I should have also noted that your objections mostly apply in the context of homosexual marriage as well. You speak of one opinion vs. another, no society based on her marriage model, crumbling of 1000s of years of law and tradition. Arguably, two sides of the same coin.

I will admit up front that the backup you look for might not all be there yet. Some of it is probably out there now. The rest will be, as I have described above.

Yes, it is perfectly obvious she speaks only of voluntary polygamy, but you know that.