T100 World Tour 2025

I sort of stand corrected now that I’ve mathed it out - its still a judgement call, but the math is below

If Gentle goes to Vegas and wins 35 points, Knibb at 2nd would be 28 point, so the difference is 7 points. If that happens Gentle would be on 105 with Knibb on 98 points. Or if Knibb wins, then they swap scores.

Winner for GF gets 55 points vs 45 for second place, or 10 points, then 5 points less per place down to 5th. So no matter what happens, the GF winner takes the whole series (assuming they go 1-2)

If Gentle stays home, she’s on 92 points vs a max of 105 for Knibb. So, she’d need to win the GF and have Knibb be 3rd or below.

Anyone doing Ibiza and Vegas and Dubai gets max a week and a half of training in (its 3 weeks, but recovery + rest for the next one, plus travel), so its a tougher turn around. Then it’s only 4 weeks to the GF, with another tight turn around back to the middle east. Whereas if you skip Vegas, you get 7 weeks between races and don’t have to take 2 transatlantic flights.

So the question becomes: does Gentle risk Vegas, knowing that Knibb currently has her number, or does she put in a solid training block, knowing that Knibb has a big race/travel schedule? (And hope she gets tired).

I guess the answer comes down to a judgement call how she feels Ibiza went vs her potential - whether she can win vs Knibb on current form. But either way the math would be a whole lot easier if they went top 4 count. And if you’re PTO wanting more Gentle vs Knibb matchups, this is what you want, since a 4 scores count system means Gentle goes to Vegas.

My money is on Knibb walking away with the title no matter what Gentle does, so it’s probably all moot anyway

Just a polite reminder that the thread title contains a “2025”…

Might have a strong look at Ibiza, combine that with some clubbing atterwards!

This is the metric I was referring and looking at. Seems like she would want to have her own destiny in her hands, and not that she has to win and Knibb has to fall below 3rd. Seems like each would want it so that whoever wins the GF wins the series too, and really how it should be for us fans…

Indeed it would be awesome that both are on the line and whoever wins, takes the grand prize!

I agree with you, it would be good if they had 25 athletes line up, gives more athletes the opportunity and as we have seen some wildcards have raced better than some of the previously higher ranked contracted athletes.

Meanwhile Ditlev is just chilling on 79 points and no intention of going to LLV…

…with 6 athletes within 10 points , and van Riel only needing an 11th spot in Vegas to overtake the lead

And just to help people: here’s the link to the 2024 thread which would benefit from the excellent chat:

Or you could just delete this thread @kajet and start it again.

1 Like

25 contracted athletes implies 25% more cost or contracts worth, on average, only 80% of the 2024 one. The ‘wildcard’ system seems to have worked well. Fail to see why the fact that “some wildcards have raced better than some of the contracted athletes” is a reason for extending the field to >20. After the swim (where we’ve seen some comedic video opportunities of lone sharks off the back) the second half of the field already get minimal coverage, unless they are riding appreciably faster than the front 5.