Pat Tillman Article

I’d love to hear what slowtwitchers think of this article by Mickey Z. over at counterpunch.com:

The World Doesn’t Need More Heroes Like This
Inspired by Pat Tillman?

By MICKEY Z.

You fasten the triggers
For the others to fire
Then you set back and watch
When the death count gets higher
You hide in your mansion
As young people's blood
Flows out of their bodies
And is buried in the mud.

Bob Dylan, "Masters of War"

Here’s how the New York Times described Pat Tillman: “A graduate of Arizona State University, Tillman, a safety, played for four seasons with the Arizona Cardinals. But as an unrestricted free agent in 2002, he turned town a three-year, $3.6 million contract offer from the Cardinals and enlisted in the Army.”

Thus, when Tillman was killed in action in Afghanistan last week, the predictable platitudes followed.

For example, former teammate Corey Sears said: “All the guys that complain about it being too hot or they don’t have enough money, that’s not real life. A real life thing is he died for what he believed in.”

There was no mention if Sears views Iraqis or Afghanis dying for what they believe in to be “a real life thing” or if that experience if reserved exclusively for Americans. There are a lot of people, like Sears, speaking for Tillman since his death but none have elaborated upon what it was he “believed in” enough to die for…except bland statements about “defending freedom” or “giving something back.” Here is a brief sampling:

* Former Cardinals head coach Dave McGinnis said Tillman "represented all that was good in sports" and "proudly walked away from a career in football to a greater calling."

* "Pat Tillman personified all the best values of his country and the NFL," said commissioner Paul Tagliabue.

* "Where do we get such men as these? Where to we find these people willing to stand up for America?" asked Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Arizona. "He chose action rather than words. He just wanted to serve his country. He was a remarkable person. He lived the American dream, and he fought to preserve the American dream and our way of life."

We’ve all heard this kind of talk before (Does the space shuttle crash ring a bell?) but it does little except soothe Americans who want to believe in heroes. Talk of “best values,” “a greater calling,” and “the American dream” roll off the tongues of the average citizen but how would that same citizen react if a “war hero” came home sick from exposure to depleted uranium and decided to speak out against the U.S. government and its crimes? Would he/she still be revered for “preserving our way of life” if s/he organized protests and boycotts and reached out in solidarity across international borders to those who have suffered from U.S. foreign policy?

We all know the answer to that last question, don’t we? Tillman (or someone like him) could’ve chosen to “serve their country” by challenging the corporate-mandated status quo…but that’s not how things work around here, is it?

Instead we get endless talk about preserving freedom and defending our way of life and standing up for America. Such cliches are designed to discourage critical thought but the questions must be asked: Which freedoms? What way of life? Standing up for whom and why?

Are those men and women in Afghanistan and Iraq in agreement with, say, for-profit health care for the few or pre-emptive wars or corporate welfare or the death penalty or maybe unelected presidents? Are they fighting to defend strip malls, SUVs, or cell phones…or maybe the right to vote for the next “American Idol”? I’d just like some clarification.

Is it really a “greater calling” for an ex-NFL player to hunt down CIA-created Taliban fighters in Afghanistan (with much “collateral damage,” of course) in a misguided, myopic attempt to avenge 9/11?

What values is NFL commissioner Tagliabue referring to…the values canonized in our history texts (but ignored in reality) or the values of militarism and greed this nation has lived by for over 200 years?

Which America was Tillman standing up for…the bosses at Halliburton or the homeless guy I see every day on the subway steps? The country personified by war criminals like Bush and Kerry? The country defined by corporate pirates? Indeed, soldiers like Tillman aren’t serving the 2 million behind bars or the 2 million locked in nursing homes against their will. The actions they chose over words don’t make our air or water cleaner or stop the suburban sprawl. If anything, they have the exactly opposite effect.

What American dream are Tillman’s eulogizers talking about? The dreams of Wal-Mart, Nike, and The Gap? Whose way of life…Wall Street speculators, professional athletes, and digitally- or surgically-enhanced celebrities? I certainly didn’t ask him (or anyone) to kill for me and he sure wasn’t protecting anything I hold dear. Soldiers like Pat Tillman, to me, seem like heavily-conditioned American males…the spawn of decades of corporate conditioning and State-sponsored patriotism.

I know many will say Tillman was defending my right to voice dissenting opinions: “In other countries, you can’t write this kind of stuff.” But none of those critics will ever explain how Pat Tillman’s actions or his death impacts on anyone’s freedom to write an article in America. That question is left unasked…as if the answer were obvious.

But yet again, the opposite is true. As Arundhati Roy explains, “The organizations that control the world todayÐthe WTO, the IMF, the World BankÐoperate in complete secrecy.” This nefarious system guarantees that the Tillmans of the world will be revered as heroes…while the beat goes on.

Pat Tillman walking away from millions to “fight for his country” (by becoming a mercenary for Corporate America) does not awe me as much as the dangerous skill to manipulate humans into consistently acting against their interests and the interests of the entire planet.

“People often are conscripted into armies, but sometimes they enlist with gusto,” explains Steven Pinker, director of the Center of Cognitive Neuroscience at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Jingoism,” Pinker declares, “is alarmingly easy to evoke.”

“War itself is venal, dirty, confusing and perhaps the most potent narcotic invented by humankind,” says New York Times columnist Chris Hedges. “It allows us to suspend individual conscience, maybe even consciousness, for the cause. And few of us are immune… The contagion of war, of the siren call of the nation, is so strong that most cannot resist.”

But resist we must…and unless we in America create powerful and urgent ways to resist, we cannot expect the victims of our indifference and ineptitude not to hold each of us accountable.

“he brown-skinned folks dying in the millions in order to maintain this way of life… wait forever for those who purport to be the opposition here to find some personally comfortable and pure manner of affecting the kind of transformation that brings not just lethal but genocidal processes to a halt,” explains Ward Churchill in a recent interview.

Churchill warns ominously that those “brown-skinned folks dying in the millions” have “no obligation-moral, ethical, legal or otherwise-to sit on their thumbs while the opposition here dithers about doing anything to change the system.”

The world doesn’t need any more “heroes” like Pat Tillman. It doesn’t need young men and womenÐheads filled with noble aspirations sent off to die to defend corporate profit. The world needs the American people to snap out of their propaganda-induced fog ASAP and seek a “greater calling” in the truest sense.

Mickey Z. is the author of two upcoming books: “A Gigantic Mistake: Articles and Essays for Your Intellectual Self-Defense” (Prime Books/Library Empyreal) and “The Seven Deadly Spins: Exposing the Lies Behind War Propaganda” (Common Courage Press). He can be reached at mzx2@earthlink.net.

It’s bullshit. To a letter.

First of all, although I disagree with what we’re doing in Iraq, Afghanistan is a different story. Afghanistan was, in actual fact, harboring the terrorists responsible for a vicious, unprovoked, criminal, atrocious attack on the United States and its citizens. We gave the rulers of Afghanistan a chance to turn them over, and fair warning of what would happen if they declined. They declined. We had every right to do what we did in Afghanistan.

More importantly, whether or not I agree with the war in Iraq (or anywhere else), my opinion on that does not, in any way, detract from the bravery and sacrifice of any individual serving there. Pat Tillman and many, many others put on that uniform to fight for America, to fight for us. Because I disagree, as a civilian, with the orders they are given does not mean that I expect them, or want them, to disobey those orders.

We absolutely, without a doubt, most certainly do need more people like Tillman and his brothers in arms. The world is poorer with their loss, but richer by their example.

That article ignores the point of Tillman’s story: that he made great sacrifice to fight for something he believed in. That’s the greatness of his story, in my opinion. The above author seems to say, “Why all the noise about Tillman’s death? After all, he was doing something ***I ***don’t agree with.”

And, as Vitus said, our presence in Afghanistan is entirely justified. Regardless of whether or not it was a problem of our own creation (which is very debatable), the Talibs were actively furthering Al Qaeda’s war against the West. The Taliban’s guests hit us hard, with the Talib’s assistance, and we hit back.

As an aside, did anyone see today’s article (New York Times, I think. Front page, above the fold.) about the active calls for global jihad being made by many of Europe’s Islamists? “It is useless to fight against us, because death is what we want,” or something like that. They’re calling for martyrdom against their host countries if those countries don’t back off their support of the war on terror. What’s wrong with these people?

first, let me say that i am definitely a liberal and value people being allowed to voice various points of view. that being said, this guy is so far out of line and out of touch.

first, he intimates that tillman and anyone involved in the war have been brainwashed into maintaining the status quo. if that was the case, why is tillman’s story noteworthy at all? shouldn’t that mean there would be dozens and dozens of tillman like stories out there? why isn’t everyone beating a path to the local recruiter’s door instead of having possible manpower shortages because people aren’t enlisting any more?

second, what kind of puss is he to dump on tillman as basically a brainwashed, corporate lackey/stooge/pawn, and then write under a pen name? be a man, state your opinion and let everyone know who you are.

third, this guy is strongly insinuating that the “real” fight is making changes from within this country, rather than being “manipulated” into being put in harm’s way by corporate america. to me, it reeks of fear. it’s easy to dissent when you are half a world away from the fighting and you know you won’t ever have to be in harm’s way. i am not afraid to admit that my fear would outweigh any convictions that i hold.

lastly, he seems to indicate that part of the reason we were attacked is that the opposition forces within america lollygagged for so long in trying to make changes in the international/national power structure that the terrorists took the initiative and attacked. what absolute naive crap. there is not a policy, social, political change that the u.s. could make that would make the jihadist zealots not want america eradicated. they hate us and want to inflict as much pain and suffering on us as possible. period. can he really believe that the trade center went down because osama is upset with the imf? it’s not like he didn’t come from means…

wow this guy got me really fired up…

His article is disrespectful to Mr. Tillman, his memory, his family, all of those he fought with and those who have given their lives and their families. It is a slap in the face to all those who serve and he belittles those who have made a choice to serve the country. This article is a piece of shit from top to bottom. I am respectful of those who don’t like the war in Iraq, there are two sides and history will sort it out, but the cloud he throws over what Mr. Tillman, and others like him, do in their service is inexcusable to me.

He was in Afghanistan fighting those who want to hurt our way of life, destroy it, and destroy us. "The dreams of Wal-Mart, Nike, and The Gap? Whose way of life…Wall Street speculators, professional athletes, and digitally- or surgically-enhanced celebrities? … “Are they fighting to defend strip malls, SUVs, or cell phones” I certainly didn’t ask him (or anyone) to kill for me and he sure wasn’t protecting anything I hold dear. Come down off your horse, since you apparently don’t drive a car and don’t shop. Does Mr. Z grow his own food, live in a mud house, and milk a goat? What money does he use? How does he write his ridiculous crap, on a papyrus leaf? If the way of life isn’t what you hold dear, then where does the money from your books go and why do you take up space here? What an idiot. He and his cartoon namesake are at about the same thought process.

Regardless, don’t use the soldier’s death to degrade him and those who fight with him.

By the way, quick search and I can’t find a real name for mr. z? Anyone know who this is? Just curious, because I would be really disappointed if he made statements like these and didn’t have the courage to stand behind them with his true name, even Michael Moore uses his real name.

I think the author is not as smart as he thinks he is. Somebody has to fight for our country, and it certainly won’t be the author of that article.

He wants those that take on corporations (legally, etc) to be viewed equal to those that fight with ammo. There are several differences. The idea that death is on the line is one of them. For the author to even attempt a close-parallel to be drawn between the two is offensive.

How many people are REALLY willing to put their life on the line for the country? I mean REALLY put their life on the line. We act like it’s no big deal, b/c they odds are we’ll never be called upon to do it. One thing is certain, no one else I know gave up a high paying job in order to make the ultimate sacrifice for ANYTHING they believed in, let alone militarily defending our country.

If the author gives up everything he has, including his life, to fight for something that will benefit others more than it benefits himself … he will be a hero. I’m confident the author will NEVER do that.


He seems to be using Pat Tillman’s sacrifice for something he believed in as a platform to rally against people fighting for corporate profits and and the power of the wealthy. I would be willing to bet that the majority of those fighting are fighting to protect their loved ones and neighbors.

The author says I certainly didn’t ask him (or anyone) to kill for me and he sure wasn’t protecting anything I hold dear…

Pat Tillman wasn’t protecting anything that the author holds dear? Are corporations and the wealthy the only ones that benefit from what the military does? wasn’t Pat Tillman (and others) trying to protect against against future 9/11’s? Isn’t that still a threat until the Taliban is defeated and disorganized? Isn’t that what Pat was doing in Afganistan?

I think the author should take inventory of the things he holds dear, and really evaluate whether Pat Tillman was protecting any of those things. I think, if the author is honest, and not using this event to express his political opinions, that the author will see that Pat and others ARE protecting the things we hold dear.

TT,

This guy was a bit much even for my liberal tendencies. His comments about war being a disgusting endeavor and sad state of the human condition are very true in the broad picture, but unfortunately it has happened. Canada has troops over there also and I feel very obligated to support them. IMO, Afghanistan is a justifiable cause. I’m not so sure about Iraq, and glad that we didn’t send troops there, but time will tell one way or the other whether that was the correct decision.

Whether attacking Iraq was right or wrong doesn’t really have anything to do with Tillman. Tillman was in Afganistan trying to round up Taliban members. I don’t know if Iraq was ever a threat to us, but the Taliban was/is.

Tillman wasn’t in Iraq fighting for another country’s democracy, he was literally fighting the same group that bombed New York and could easily do it again. I don’t know about the author, but I hold the lives of my neighbors dear.

The author seems to have missed that point of what Tillman was literally doing and is looking for every situation to bark about the Iraq war. I’m all for peace, but I think we all know that peace is not a feasible alternative (not using that to justify the Iraq War). A world without guns would just be a world full of people beating the snot out of each other with sticks. =)

I can appreciate (without entirely agreeing with) the author’s opposition to war and the sacrificing of military lives for what may appear to be solely corporate or political interests, but none of that applies to what Tillman was doing in Afganistan.


Later CG. Nice chating with ya again.

Well, I got jumped on last week on this topic basically for saying that there are people out there like this Mickey Z. who are cheapening the value of service to our country by intimating that only poor, uneducated people serve in the Armed Forces. But, I’ll try again to express my views.

The fact that one agrees or disagrees with a particular war or military action reflects nothing on the value of the service rendered. When a person joins the military service of our country what they are saying is: “I choose to put service to my country and my fellow citizens ahead of my own economic, personal, and safety priorities. Under my Constitution, I serve at the direction of the President and Commander-in-Chief. I trust my life totally in the wisdom of the people and their elected representatives.” You don’t say “I’ll fight if I agree with it,” or “I didn’t know I was going to have to kill someone.” This ethic of selfless service to others and country has nobility in and of itself. Certainly, what Pat Tillman did was notable in the amount of money and fame he gave up. But, everyone, whether they worked at Wal-Mart or in the NFL, who puts on the uniform of their country, has essentially made the same sacrifices Pat Tillman did. From what has been said of him, I think he would agree.

“Some gave all, all gave some.”

This guy Micky Z is clearly an asshole. I’ve never heard of him, why not the full last name? In any event, he’s one of those writers that take the contrarian view in order to be noticed, and for no other purpose. I have the upmost respect for Pat Tillman - any for all soldiers like him - for the life choices he made. When the media or individuals show respect for Pat, its for the man that he was. Politics is a red herring.

The NY Times is a commie paper. Everyone knows that.

what? how did that have anything to do with anything? the story wasn’t even in the ny times, the ny times was merely being quoted.

tri_bri2, right on, very well stated.

Mickey Z’s article is cynical beyond belief.

Idiots like this is why I don’t own a gun. Three thousand people died on September 11, were their deaths a “corporate mandate”? This country has experienced a number of attacks since the early 1990s by Islamic fundamentalist radicals and Al Queda. The attacks are not due to responses to corporate America activities or even US governmental policies. We are being attacked for not being true believers in Islam and we will continue to be attactked until we are made to see the light or destroyed. Idiots like Mickey Z can forget the facts, select their arguments, rant and rave against their personal targets and continue to not contribute anything the least bit productive towards society in this country precisely because it is the United States of America where they have the freedom to do so, and which is precisely the reason the Islamic radical fundamentalists hate this country so much. Lacking a personal firearm, I would whole-heartledly go with Bunnymans’ NHL response to drafting from his earlier days if I were ever to meet up with this bozo in person.

That was inspiring. Thanks.

Josh Cunningham
RLTW!

This is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read here (I’m still laughing):

“I choose to put service to my country and my fellow citizens ahead of my own economic, personal, and safety priorities. Under my Constitution, I serve at the direction of the President and Commander-in-Chief. I trust my life totally in the wisdom of the people and their elected representatives.”

Thanks!

And how is placing service above self ridiculous? I think you’re just pissed because the article you posted was shown to be such bullshit. Kinda like your latest post.

You’re right. That was inspiring. Thanks.

Sure thing. Welcome to the real world.

Oh, and answer the question please, if you can.

After reading that, it makes me wonder what kind of world Mickey Z thinks we should be living in. I’d like to see his solutions and how he would implement them in order to make the world a more fair place to live. Can you post something? Seriously, does Mickey Z have solutions or is his ‘thing’ just to be inflammatory?