Obama and Labor, Too much Bed-time Together

too much for OUR own good I fear. Today’s townhall gave another look into what he envisions. Part of his response to this question:

“Hello, President Obama. Here is my question for your online town meeting. When can we expect that jobs that have been outsourced to other countries to come back and be made available to the unemployed workers here in the United States? Thank you so much for all your hard work. God bless you. Bye-bye.”

Was this:

“Now, one of the things that we wanted to do in the stimulus package was to go ahead and start laying a new grid. And to do that, it’s like building the Transcontinental Railroad. You’ve got a – it’s a huge project involving all 50 states.
The benefits of the grid are that we could reduce our energy costs by billions of dollars. We could set up systems so that everybody in each house have their own smart meters that will tell you when to turn off the lights, when the peak hours are, can help you sell back energy that you’ve generated in your home through a solar panel or through other mechanisms. If we get plug-in hybrid cars, you can plug it in at night and sell back electricity to the utility, and then charge up your car again in the morning before you leave.
All this can be done, but it also creates jobs right now. Our biggest problem, we don’t have enough electricians to lay all these lines out there. And these are jobs – these are union jobs that potentially pay $80,000-$90,000 a year, with benefits. But it’s a matter of making the investment in infrastructure and also then training the workers to be able to get those jobs. And that’s where we’re going to be focused on. That’s where the job growth is going to occur.”

http://www.post-trib.com/news/1497556,Town-hall-transcript-0326.article

Are you kidding? Please quote the ENTIRE answer:

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I appreciate that. Let me talk more, first of all, broadly about what’s happening in the job market. We have had just a massive loss of jobs over the last several months, the kind of job loss we haven’t seen at least since the early '80s and maybe since the 1930s, in terms of how quickly we’ve seen the economy shed jobs.
A lot of that is prompted by the financial crisis and the locking up of the credit markets. And that’s why when we are – when we talk about dealing with this credit crisis and the banks, I just want everybody to understand it’s not because we’re overly concerned about Wall Street or a bunch of CEOs; it’s because if we don’t fix credit, if we don’t get liquidity back to small businesses and large businesses alike who can have that – use that line of credit to buy inventory and to make products and sell services, then those businesses shrivel up and they start laying people off.
Ultimately, our measure of whether we’re doing a good job or not is, are we going to be able to create and save jobs? And part of that involves fixing the financial system.
There is a long-term issue, though, that we have to deal with – and this was true even before the current crisis – and that is that so much of our economic activity was in the financial services sector. It was related to an overheated housing market. It was dependent on huge amounts of consumer saving. And we were seeing those steady declines in manufacturing. We were seeing steady declines in a lot of other productive sectors of the economy. And one of the things that my budget is designed to do is, by fixing our education system, by reducing costs of health care, by going after the clean-energy jobs of the future, trying to put our economy on a more solid footing.
Now, a lot of the outsourcing that was referred to in the question really has to do with the fact that our economy – if it’s dependent on low-wage, low-skill labor, it’s very hard to hang on to those jobs because there’s always a country out there that pays lower wages than the U.S. And so we’ve got to go after the high-skill, high-wage jobs of the future. That’s why it’s so important to train our folks more effectively and that’s why it’s so important for us to find new industries – building solar panels or wind turbines or the new biofuel – that involve these higher-value, higher-skill, higher-paying jobs.
So I guess the answer to the question is, not all of these jobs are going to come back. And it probably wouldn’t be good for our economy for a bunch of these jobs to come back because, frankly, there’s no way that people could be getting paid a living wage on some of these jobs – at least in order to be competitive in an international setting.
So what we’ve got to do is create new jobs that can’t be outsourced. And that’s why energy is so promising. We’ve been talking about what’s called a smart grid, and some of you may have heard of this. The basic idea is, is that we’re still using an electricity grid that dates back 100, 150 years ago. Well, think about all the gizmos you guys are carrying – (laughter) --all the phones and the BlackBerrys and the this and the that. You’re plugging in all kinds of stuff in your house. We’ve got an entirely new set of technologies, huge demands in terms of energy, but we’ve got a grid that’s completely outdated.
Now, one of the things that we wanted to do in the stimulus package was to go ahead and start laying a new grid. And to do that, it’s like building the Transcontinental Railroad. You’ve got a – it’s a huge project involving all 50 states.
The benefits of the grid are that we could reduce our energy costs by billions of dollars. We could set up systems so that everybody in each house have their own smart meters that will tell you when to turn off the lights, when the peak hours are, can help you sell back energy that you’ve generated in your home through a solar panel or through other mechanisms. If we get plug-in hybrid cars, you can plug it in at night and sell back electricity to the utility, and then charge up your car again in the morning before you leave.
All this can be done, but it also creates jobs right now. Our biggest problem, we don’t have enough electricians to lay all these lines out there. And these are jobs – these are union jobs that potentially pay $80,000-$90,000 a year, with benefits. But it’s a matter of making the investment in infrastructure and also then training the workers to be able to get those jobs. And that’s where we’re going to be focused on. That’s where the job growth is going to occur.
One last point I want to make – and I know I’m not supposed to talk this long, but we’re going to have to be patient and persistent about job creation because I don’t think that we’ve lost all the jobs we’re going to lose in this recession. We’re still going to be in a difficult time for much of this year. Employment is typically what’s called a lagging indicator. Now, this is – Dr. Bernstein, he’s a Ph.D. economist, so he’ll correct me if I’m wrong here, but –
DR. BERNSTEIN: I’m sure I can make this really confusing. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: But historically, if you look at every recession, what happens is that when the economy starts getting in trouble, it takes a while before businesses decide, you know what, this economy is in trouble, it’s not bouncing back – we better start laying off workers. So what we’re seeing now is a lot of businesses have decided that our sales are way down, we’ve got to start shedding workers. And that’s going to continue for a while.
Now, the reverse is true, as well. When the economy starts recovering, when these businesses start being a little more confident that, you know what, we think we’ve bottomed out; the recovery package President Obama passed gives us some optimism about making investments in certain areas – it takes a while before they start hiring even if they’ve started to make these investments.
So the reason I point that out is, I don’t want people to think that in one or two months suddenly we’re going to see net job increases. It’s going to take some time for the steps that we’ve taken to filter in. The fact that the housing market is starting to stabilize a little bit – there’s still a lot of inventory out there before people then actually start building new homes. At some point people are going to start buying new cars again, but it’s going to take a little bit of time for the automakers to get back on their feet.
So employment is something that we’re going to have a difficult time for the next several months, maybe through the end of this year, but I’m confident that we’re taking the steps that are required to create these new jobs of the future.

 yes, read it...and how does that change his comment that the jobs he is talking about creating are "union jobs" for electricians?  What's wrong with just creating jobs for electricians?

With the housing/construction slump, I find it a little hard to believe that there’s a shortage of qualified electricians. But then, they might not all be good union electricians, so I guess that could make a difference.

Quite simply, when is an electrician worth $80-$90K/year?

Quite simply, when is an electrician worth $80-$90K/year?

Through my work I had occasion to spent some time dealing with electrical linesmen and learning about their work. If he’s talking about linesmen, the folks who build and maintain outdoor power lines, they can earn about that with overtime and there is a shortage of them.

There are alot of overpaid jobs in this country, from Wall Street down to the factory floor. These guys are not in that group. My strong impression after hanging out with some of them was that they earn every freakin’ dollar they make. This is not the same as installing a light fixture in a house. The big kicker is they have to work outside in any weather 30’ off the ground handling live wires carrying enough voltage that if you screw up you don’t just get a shock but you get flash cooked from the inside out. (Generally, the lines are not depowered for the work so most of the time they are working with live wires which is much different than regular indoor electrical work)

This work done inside on the ground, it’s about a $40-50K job. Its getting folks who are willing to travel far from home to where that week’s work might be and then climb up a pole during a snow storm to do the work that requires the extra dough.

+1 on what STP said. When you move from 120V up to 4.16kV, 13.8kV and then to the big lines of 178kV and 345kV, the wages go up accordingly. Knowing what I know, and being in that field, I would not want their jobs. However, at the end of the day, human nature and a touch of greed kicks in and I often think to myself that they’re overpaid. Then I think about the fact that there are not multiple ways to die everyday when I go to work…so maybe they’re not.
I think this might also be another case where people drive through a construction zone and see the lady holding the sign that reads “slow” and grumble because she’s making $25/hour, when in actuality SOME people senior folks on the crew doing technical jobs are making that amount, the local/national news found out, and now everyone assumes that anyone on a road crew makes that amount.

Yeah, I thought about the possibilities of Obama knowing very well the job, requirements, and status of the workers in that field, or Obama knowing virtually nothing about the people who actually do that work, and figured neither was accurate. It is more likely just an expectation that these will be union jobs, based on how the govt will set them up. It’s a shame that we will ultimately get less for our taxpayer money, simply because a party has a constituency it wants to pay off.

edit: Nevermind, a quick check shows that the latter is indeed the case, with language in the legislation that requires union labor in most cases.
independent electrical contractors are not happy:
http://www.ieci.org/…_Fed_Legislation.pdf

bill as it left the house:
http://www.govtrack.us/...t.xpd?bill=h110-2847

ps the only reason Obama’s statement stuck with me at all, is because of a recent flap where some states balked at requirements that they had to pay union wages for work completed with some of their federal funds.

Quite simply, when is an electrician worth $80-$90K/year?

Not to split hairs, but, he said these jobs “pay” $80-90k per year, not that they were “worth” that amount. Also, he said “with benefits.” Now, not sure if he means the yearly compensation is $80-90k/yr when you count in the benefits or if he meant the benefits were on top of that salary amount.

I do not believe he was referring to the high line, high voltage operators. I think he was referring to “electricians” in the basic sense of the term. I am a management-side labor lawyer who has negotiated countless union contracts and I can tell you from experience that $80-90k/year WITH benefits included is within the norm.

That salary includes:

  1. Union dues
  2. Union pension fund
  3. Union trades fund
  4. Health/dental/vision insurance
  5. Possibly additional benefits

During my last contract negotiations, the Union proposed a salary increase for all employees of $2.75 per hour. Of that amount, $0.50 was to go toward wages and $2.25 was to go to the Union “pension and welfare fund.” Many union pension funds are broke or going broke. It is much like Social Security. There is not enough money in the fund, so, current employees are being asked to fund more.

Ultimately, we settled on $0.75 per hour increase. Of that $0.10 went to the employee and $0.65 went straight to the Union. Yep, the workers sure got the full value of their union dues out of that deal.

I do agree with the OP that the creation of “union electrician jobs” is flat out wrong. It should be the creation of “electrician jobs,” then let the individuals decide whether they want to be part of a union. Remember, this is the same Administration that is pushing for the Employee Free Choice Act, which eliminates the secret ballot election for union elections and allows unions to strong-arm their way in. So, it is not surprising to hear President Obama looking for a way to create more “union jobs.”

I was indeed hoping to stir (emhuharg “start”) a discussion regarding the excesses of organized labor.

Agreed with JSA, most of this is scary stuff.

Amazing how unions and pensions do not get the joke. Sure they fund it, but ultimately, what the employee puts in relative to what he gets out is, typically, pretty incredible. The time value of money usually works in their favor…

I don’t feel bad in any instance regarding a pension arguement. Most of us have to fund the vast majority of our retirement on our own…

Amazing how unions and pensions do not get the joke. Sure they fund it, but ultimately, what the employee puts in relative to what he gets out is, typically, pretty incredible. The time value of money usually works in their favor…

I don’t feel bad in any instance regarding a pension arguement. Most of us have to fund the vast majority of our retirement on our own…

I’m not sure I understand what you are saying. IF every dollar put into the union pension fund went towards the current employees, it would be a good deal. However, in my experience, that is currently not the case. In my experience, the union pension funds are grossly underfunded and some are on the verge of going broke. So, when the union negotiates for an additional $1.00 per hour per employee into the pension fund, that entire dollar is not being placed into the fund for the current employees. What I am seeing is figures like $0.90 of that dollar going into the fund to “catch up” or keep it from going broke.

The employees in this particular situation would be better off ditching the pension fund completely and doing a 401(k) with matching employer contribution (in lieu of employer contributions to the union pension fund). At least that way the employee knows that what the employee puts in is actually going to the employee.

The rate of return on union pension plans continues to decline. Many of the auto worker pension plans are nearly dried up. Same in the airline industry. Don’t get me wrong, some plans are doing quite well.

I

There are alot of overpaid jobs in this country, from Wall Street down to the factory floor. These guys are not in that group. My strong impression after hanging out with some of them was that they earn every freakin’ dollar they make. This is not the same as installing a light fixture in a house. The big kicker is they have to work outside in any weather 30’ off the ground handling live wires carrying enough voltage that if you screw up you don’t just get a shock but you get flash cooked from the inside out. (Generally, the lines are not depowered for the work so most of the time they are working with live wires which is much different than regular indoor electrical work)

I agree 1000%. Linemen have balls of steel and nerves of ice. I get in some crazy situations in my job and I bow to these guys. When they work, especially in an emergency, they are working long hours in whatever weather mother nature is throwing at them. It is not uncommon for a typical midwest thunderstorm to create 1000’s of lines down, power outages, and transformer fires. These guys are charged with cleaning up that mess; and every single one of those situations are life hazards.

I guarantee you 99.9% of the people on this board wouldn’t want anything to do with that job.

Bernie

this thread is based on Obama’s one-time-use of the word ‘Union’ - and for that there’s all this clamor.

But casting that aside - - Is there such a thing as too much organized labor? Why shouldn’t Labor have the right to collectively bargain and negotiate for pay and benefits?

**Is there such a thing as too much organized labor? Why shouldn’t Labor have the right to collectively bargain and negotiate for pay and benefits? **

I am a fairly strong workers’ rights advocate. I am also in a Union.

I think there is a balance that needs to be reached between labor and management. I think Unions are important because they give a group of people the ability to collectively negotiate the terms of working conditions (hours, rate of pay, benefits, etc.). It would be impossible to do this individually in larger companies, especially when there is a disconnect between the people making decisions and the people doing the work.

When I am involved in the negotiation of a contract, I strive to work with management to find win-win compromises based on the direction we want to take the department. In other words, we actually sit down and say “this is where we want to go, how are we going to get there given our current budget constraints.” We communication is the key to fair and balanced negotiation, in my opinion.

I think many people get upset at Unions because of the protections that it affords employees. I understand that, believe me, I find it distasteful in some circumstances too. But having just gotten out of a fairly oppressive situation with a Chief who spent the better part of the last 3 years ignoring the CBA, suspending people, rewriting rules, policies, SOP’s-not telling anyone-and then holding us accountable for them…well I can only say that I am personally glad that I had that protection.

I think the other good thing about Unions is that they can be very important in maintaining safe working conditions. I have a side by side study of a comparison of 2 mining operations, one union the other not. Within a close period of time both mining operations suffered similar cave-ins. Interestingly, the unionized operations were able to save every single one of the miners who were trapped and the non-union operation lost all of their’s. When whatever investigative agency looked into those accidents, it was determined that the primary reason that the miners were saved in the one operation was that there were much higher safety standards and a higher level of training that were mandated in the union contract. Did they cost the company to implement? Absolutely. But those costs were directly responsible for saving the miner’s lives.

Bernie

this thread is based on Obama’s one-time-use of the word ‘Union’ - and for that there’s all this clamor.

But casting that aside - - Is there such a thing as too much organized labor? Why shouldn’t Labor have the right to collectively bargain and negotiate for pay and benefits?

Lessee,

GM, Ford, The USPS and Education in the U.S.

this thread is based on Obama’s one-time-use of the word ‘Union’ - and for that there’s all this clamor.

But casting that aside - - Is there such a thing as too much organized labor? Why shouldn’t Labor have the right to collectively bargain and negotiate for pay and benefits?
nah, this thread is about the federal govt taking more of our money, then meting it out while attaching requirements that favor or require the use of more expensive, less flexible, and arguably less productive workers. State’s hands are tied in yet more ways, and less gets done for the money. Personally I think unions have their place, maybe moreso today than in recent years, because of the excesses of upper mgmt. That does not mean that unions themselves are not in need of massive change, or that I think there is any efficiency gained by making a heretofore non-union workplace unionized. All that said, I may soon be helping to vote a union into my workplace…ahhh the irony.

All that said, I may soon be helping to vote a union into my workplace

Not if I find out where you work and send the company my card … :wink:

All that said, I may soon be helping to vote a union into my workplace

Not if I find out where you work and send the company my card … :wink:
Delta Airlines, but they’ve already got the anti-union propaganda machine running hard. :slight_smile:

All that said, I may soon be helping to vote a union into my workplace

Not if I find out where you work and send the company my card … :wink:
Delta Airlines, but they’ve already got the anti-union propaganda machine running hard. :slight_smile:

GOOD FOR THEM! I kid, I kid …

Good luck and have fun. Union campaigns suck. Most of them get a little heated, but, not out of control. Unfortunately, my last one got violent and involved damage to vehicles and other personal property (my car included).