Went on sale yesterday or today. I ordered a pair and should have them next week. Looking forward to trying them out.
I said in another thread these shoes are going to be a potential problem at IM and other tri races because people love their Hokas and these are illegal at 48mm of stack. Folks are going to love them when training in them and will want to use them to run the 13.1 or 26.2 in their next 70.3 or IM and have no clue they’re not allowed for racing.
No idea what the actual rules are, but I’d be totally fine if enforcement only happened at the finish line. If you’re trying to KQ you should know these aren’t allowed (if that’s the case) and shouldn’t be able to claim a spot, but why on earth would anyone care if the person finishing 35th in their AG ran in these?
These are super comfy. I tried on a pair about 6 weeks ago. We’ve had them in the store for sale for the last month.
Everyone who puts them on loves them. 100%.
Not everyone loves the price. I just wish they came in wide
Lack of wide is a bit concerning. I will see how they fit. I’m normally okay in a size 12 regular (but far prefer wide) with Hoka and reviews say they’re roomy.
So this is a Hokas answer to Asics Superblast and Adidas Prime X? Yeah I don’t get why they ban these for AG. If they are not going for the money, podium or KQ, it shouldn’t matter. I can see the point though. They want to draw a line somewhere
I imagine race officials will enforce stack height rules similar to drafting, i.e. focusing mostly on the pros and FOP age-groupers. I doubt they’ll be DQ’ing people right and left at the finish line and withholding finisher medals. It would be, for instance, a PR disaster if IM DQ’ed a cancer survivor or wounded warrior at the Ironman finish line because their shoe is too tall.
Listen to the slowtwitch podcast with Jimmy Riccitello - it may not be a race official in the course of the event, it could be a racing peer or a spectator that reports you and prompts an investigation where things like race day photos may be reviewed.
I would love to hear how they go for you, I was really disappointed in my last pair of Bondi’s. And like many here, I like a wider shoe, but often just go with a bigger one to accommodate, so would like your take on their sizing too…
And to the guy that asked who would these be for, well just about everyone of us that got hooked on the original Bondi and now find the new versions just too stiff. At least that would be my hope…
Is this a training shoe primarily? If so, why does it have a carbon plate? Didn’t we just have a long discussion about training in non carbon shoes?
I’m just confused what the intent of the shoe is and who’s the audience.
Yes, it’s a training shoe. I also see this shoe replacing the people who use the Bondi because they are on their feet all day. Medical field, warehouse workers, people standing all day for work. (these groups were ~ 75% of our Bondi sales over the last 24mo, not runners). Now if some of them can get over the price tag is another story.
Does it replace the Bondi X? I noticed the Bondi X (my shoe) apparently is now gone from the Hoka website.
No. It’s got a different feel than the Bondi X
This is an ultra plush shoe. In fact I’d call it the most plush running shoe on the market.
So the Bondi X, Hoka’s previous plush-and-plated shoe went away at the same time a new plush/plated shoe arrived purely by coincidence?
Edit: Not trying to be snarky…I realize you could have interpreted my question as “Is the new shoe like the Bondi X?”
My question was more, “Does Hoka intend this as their new plush/plated shoe that will replace the Bondi X? Or is the Bondi X just gone because it’s being updated?”
Is this a training shoe primarily? If so, why does it have a carbon plate? Didn’t we just have a long discussion about training in non carbon shoes?
I’m just confused what the intent of the shoe is and who’s the audience.
As a Bondi X user I have two answers.
First, a racing shoe is whatever shoe you race in. And the Skyward X or Bondi X are just fine to race in. Yes, you’ll give a second or two per km in weight. If that matters to you.
Second, I find myself running a little different in plated shoes. The Bondi X “rewards” subtle differences in stride. I like it. I think it makes sense to train how you race. Back in my collegiate running days I’d wear the minimalist stuff the best marathoners were running…now at age 50…yeah, the Skyward X ain’t gonna hold me back.
That said, I think it makes almost no sense for non-runners - medical people, etc - to wear a plated shoe. Unless there’s literally no other way to get the magical plushness.
Is this a training shoe primarily? If so, why does it have a carbon plate? Didn’t we just have a long discussion about training in non carbon shoes?
I’m just confused what the intent of the shoe is and who’s the audience.
Yes, it’s a training shoe. I also see this shoe replacing the people who use the Bondi because they are on their feet all day. Medical field, warehouse workers, people standing all day for work. (these groups were ~ 75% of our Bondi sales over the last 24mo, not runners). Now if some of them can get over the price tag is another story.
Thanks. I ran in a bondi x a few years ago. After 1-2 runs I wasn’t a fan. Ended up sending them back.
How would these compare to the ASICS nimbus? I started running in them recently (nimbus 25) to help with coming back from a major injury and over a year and half of not running. I’m a fan so far but I’m not running anything fast and just trying to put in consistent slow running without anything flaring up. I can see myself running in these long term for easy runs.
Listen to the slowtwitch podcast with Jimmy Riccitello - it may not be a race official in the course of the event, it could be a racing peer or a spectator that reports you and prompts an investigation where things like race day photos may be reviewed.
They’re no peer if they report the 52nd in the age group for wearing this or the prime x, they’re just an a-hole. Screams Marathon investigation type shenanigans, remember, dumb shit that has caused people to commit suicide.
So the Bondi X, Hoka’s previous plush-and-plated shoe went away at the same time a new plush/plated shoe arrived purely by coincidence?
Edit: Not trying to be snarky…I realize you could have interpreted my question as “Is the new shoe like the Bondi X?”
My question was more, “Does Hoka intend this as their new plush/plated shoe that will replace the Bondi X? Or is the Bondi X just gone because it’s being updated?”
The Hoka rep didn’t frame it as this is a Bondi X replacement. More along the lines this is a very plush shoe built on the J or H frame (I can’t remember which) that is designed for people who want the max cushioning available in any shoe in any brand. When I put it on I took 2 steps forward, turned and asked if it came in wide. If it had I would have ordered it on the spot. Especially given dealer cost.
It’s the most plush shoe and the most comfortable shoe I’ve ever put on my feet. Full stop. Or at least that i can remember.
Sorry I can’t more directly answer your is the Bondi X going away. I feel like I heard that it was but don’t quote me on that.
That said, I think it makes almost no sense for non-runners - medical people, etc - to wear a plated shoe. Unless there’s literally no other way to get the magical plushness.
What medical people, warehouse workers, people on their feet all day long want is comfort so their feet are not hurting at the end of a 6h surgery or a 12h shift walking 17 miles on concrete. They don’t care if it’s plated or not. They want cush, they want softness, they want to feel like their feet are being hugged on a pillow and not on a hard piece of foam.
They often self select a plated shoe based on these factors. You can bring them the Brooks ghost to try and the Brooks Glycerin 11/10 they select the Glycerin or Nimbus over the ghost. I suspect they will now select the Skyward