BS cries of "RACISM!" and organized SJW hysteria finally comes with a price

Eleven million dollars, to be exact. It’s too bad the torch and pitchfork wielders don’t have to pay directly out of pocket. And it’s too bad it doesn’t turn out this way more often.

(CNN)** **An Ohio jury has ordered Oberlin College to pay $11 million to a bakery which said it was libeled and wrongfully accused of racially profiling students.

The case stems from the November 2016 arrests of three black Oberlin students at Gibson’s Bakery and market near the college’s campus in Oberlin, Ohio.

One student, Jonathan Aladin, was accused of attempted robbery for allegedly trying to “steal wine or otherwise illegally obtain wine” from the bakery, according to a defamation lawsuit. He would eventually confess in a written statement to buying alcohol illegally.

Two other suspects, Cecelia Whettston and Endia J. Lawrence, were arrested and accused of misdemeanor assault, court documents state.

After that, Oberlin staff members tried to discredit the family-owned bakery, the lawsuit says.

Oberlin College staff – including deans and professors – and students engaged in demonstrations in front of Gibson’s Bakery following the arrests of the three students, the lawsuit stated.

The suit also said Oberlin Vice President and Dean of Students Meredith Raimondo and other college staff members “handed out hundreds of copies” of a flier to the community and the media stating that Gibson’s Bakery and its owners racially profiled and discriminated against the three students.

The court documents include a copy of the flier, which included the words “DON’T BUY.”

“This is a RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION,” the flier read, according to the lawsuit.

The flier also listed 10 of the bakery’s competitors and urged customers to shop there instead.

Then in November 2016, the lawsuit stated, Oberlin College said it severed its business ties with Gibson’s Bakery. The shop had provided baked goods for the school’s dining services through a third-party company.

While those business ties were reinstated three months later, the shop had already suffered severe consequences, the suit said.

The combined effects of the “defamation, boycotts, demonstrations, and refusal to do business with Gibson’s Bakery was having a devastating effect on Gibson’s Bakery and the Gibson family,” the lawsuit stated.

In August 2017, nine months after the three students were arrested, all three pleaded guilty to attempted theft and aggravated trespass.

In a written statement, Aladin confessed to using a fake ID to try to buy alcohol when a shop clerk tried to detain him.

“This unfortunate incident was triggered by an attempt to purchase alcohol,” Aladin wrote, according to court documents. “I believe the employees of Gibson’s actions were not racially motivated. They were merely trying to prevent an underage sale.”

On Friday, a jury found Oberlin College liable for defamation, infliction of intentional emotional distress and intentional interference of business relationships.

Eleven million dollars, to be exact. It’s too bad the torch and pitchfork wielders don’t have to pay directly out of pocket. And it’s too bad it doesn’t turn out this way more often.

(CNN)** **An Ohio jury has ordered Oberlin College to pay $11 million to a bakery which said it was libeled and wrongfully accused of racially profiling students.

The case stems from the November 2016 arrests of three black Oberlin students at Gibson’s Bakery and market near the college’s campus in Oberlin, Ohio.

One student, Jonathan Aladin, was accused of attempted robbery for allegedly trying to “steal wine or otherwise illegally obtain wine” from the bakery, according to a defamation lawsuit. He would eventually confess in a written statement to buying alcohol illegally.

Two other suspects, Cecelia Whettston and Endia J. Lawrence, were arrested and accused of misdemeanor assault, court documents state.

After that, Oberlin staff members tried to discredit the family-owned bakery, the lawsuit says.

Oberlin College staff – including deans and professors – and students engaged in demonstrations in front of Gibson’s Bakery following the arrests of the three students, the lawsuit stated.

The suit also said Oberlin Vice President and Dean of Students Meredith Raimondo and other college staff members “handed out hundreds of copies” of a flier to the community and the media stating that Gibson’s Bakery and its owners racially profiled and discriminated against the three students.

The court documents include a copy of the flier, which included the words “DON’T BUY.”

“This is a RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION,” the flier read, according to the lawsuit.

The flier also listed 10 of the bakery’s competitors and urged customers to shop there instead.

Then in November 2016, the lawsuit stated, Oberlin College said it severed its business ties with Gibson’s Bakery. The shop had provided baked goods for the school’s dining services through a third-party company.

While those business ties were reinstated three months later, the shop had already suffered severe consequences, the suit said.

The combined effects of the “defamation, boycotts, demonstrations, and refusal to do business with Gibson’s Bakery was having a devastating effect on Gibson’s Bakery and the Gibson family,” the lawsuit stated.

In August 2017, nine months after the three students were arrested, all three pleaded guilty to attempted theft and aggravated trespass.

In a written statement, Aladin confessed to using a fake ID to try to buy alcohol when a shop clerk tried to detain him.

“This unfortunate incident was triggered by an attempt to purchase alcohol,” Aladin wrote, according to court documents. “I believe the employees of Gibson’s actions were not racially motivated. They were merely trying to prevent an underage sale.”

On Friday, a jury found Oberlin College liable for defamation, infliction of intentional emotional distress and intentional interference of business relationships.

From what I’ve read, sounds justified to me. Kid does something stupid. Kid gets caught for doing stupid thing and blames someone else for his own actions. Then, idiots agree without looking at all the evidence and pile on. Idiots got what they deserved.

Eleven million dollars, to be exact. It’s too bad the torch and pitchfork wielders don’t have to pay directly out of pocket. And it’s too bad it doesn’t turn out this way more often.

I just read a piece about the torch and pitchfork wielders in the yarn world. Who knew?
Truly a discouraging and disgusting time in which we live. https://quillette.com/2019/06/07/instagrams-diversity-wars-revisited/

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

It is my own political decision to choose not to speak from the particular social media script that has repeatedly been presented to me (with various level of demand); to carefully listen to marginalised voices rather than to shout; to not participate in acts of shaming and intimidation; and to refuse to engage with those who insist that the only way I can effectively demonstrate my antiracist solidarity is by continually displaying it in my Instagram stories.

Yeah, the nerve of that woman. Tar and feathers aren’t nearly enough.

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

I read the post 3 times and still have no idea how you jumped to that question (“conclusion”).

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

Truth be told, I thought my posting history was well known enough such that the was unnecessary.

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

Truth be told, I thought my posting history was well known enough such that the was unnecessary.

New people should learn to introduce themselves around here. :slight_smile:

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

Truth be told, I thought my posting history was well known enough such that the was unnecessary.

I caught the sarcasm. Not sure how Veganerd missed it.

I just “learned” on NPR yesterday that “SJW” and the full “Social Justice Warrior” were terms that were coined by “Right Wing White Naionalists” to dehumanize “their critics”.

No joke.

I just “learned” on NPR yesterday that “SJW” and the full “Social Justice Warrior” were terms that were coined by “Right Wing White Naionalists” to dehumanize “their critics”.

No joke.

At face value, taking any keyboard warrior meaning away from it, it sounds like a pretty nice label to have.

Jesus seems to have been a SJW.

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

Truth be told, I thought my posting history was well known enough such that the was unnecessary.

I was confused, sorry.

Wait a minute… Are you saying that racism doesn’t exist?

No, he isn’t saying anything close to that.

Truth be told, I thought my posting history was well known enough such that the was unnecessary.

I caught the sarcasm. Not sure how Veganerd missed it.

I don’t know. I have dishonored myself.

I see rally cries for “Prayer Warriors” among my religious FB friends pretty regularly, when someone is acutely ill or in crisis. I guess it’s one of those N-word type labels where it’s a positive or a negative, depending on whose mouth it comes from.

I just “learned” on NPR yesterday that “SJW” and the full “Social Justice Warrior” were terms that were coined by “Right Wing White Naionalists” to dehumanize “their critics”.

No joke.

At face value, taking any keyboard warrior meaning away from it, it sounds like a pretty nice label to have.

Jesus seems to have been a SJW.

Jesus is a fictional character.

https://youtu.be/ZBdnyrzq96s
.

I skimmed the story online yesterday and was surprised? that the trustees of Oberlin were not firing people.

I skimmed the story online yesterday and was surprised? that the trustees of Oberlin were not firing people.

Because they still don’t think they did anything wrong.

Yeah, but that’s understandable. I mean, how could anyone think it *wasn’t *pure racism.

In a written statement, Aladin confessed to using a fake ID to try to buy alcohol when a shop clerk tried to detain him.

“This unfortunate incident was triggered by an attempt to purchase alcohol,” Aladin wrote, according to court documents. “I believe the employees of Gibson’s actions were not racially motivated. They were merely trying to prevent an underage sale.”

Black kid admitting to a crime and that it wasn’t a racially motivated accusation or detention. Proof positive of racism in action–a coerced statement, no doubt.