buzz wrote:
you are confounding variables. the mask question is about the extent to which it reduces transmission meaningfully in some class of setting.
so far as i am aware, the data says yes.
I don't think I am. There's no question wearing a mask reduces the projection caused by an exhale. Two masks reduces it further so. And pouring concrete around your head even more so than that.
The question is whether the policy and behavior actually results in benefits that justify the effort. Anecdotally, I can drive up 287 and in a few hundred miles arrive in counties here in Texas where nobody wears a mask. Not in a store. Not in a restaurant. And not at sporting events. In fact, they've been in school, playing sports, filling gymnasiums shoulder-to-shoulder, and living life in a fairly normal fashion for several months.
Meanwhile, here in the DFW area the culture of masks and social distancing is 180 degrees different. Even now that the mandate has been lifted, virtually every store and workplace and restaurant is behaving as if they are still on high alert. Everyone wears a mask. Everyone distances. I went to a local store yesterday to shop for an office chair and had to get my temperature taken, had to sanitize my hands (despite the CDC recently revealing surface-to-surface transmission doesn't happen), had to fill out a questionnaire regarding my current health, and had to sign a waiver. And I did all that even though I'm vaccinated and was wearing a mask.
And despite drastic behavioral differences between DFW and elsewhere, everyone seems to fare about the same. If there is a difference, it's extremely difficult to discern.
So that prompts the question - does wearing a mask and going to restaurants and living life normally really put one at an unmanageable risk level? I think there's enough evidence to justify my skepticism.
At every step, I've been assured certain mass death was right around the corner:
- When restaurants and stores were opened to limited capacity last Spring, I was told our politicians were stupid, selfish, evil, and sending people to their deaths. That was incorrect.
- When schools were opening here last fall, I was told we were "sentencing our teachers to death". That was incorrect. Some recommended teachers protest en masse because of the risk they face.
- When schools and colleges started playing sports and allowing fans, I was told it was incredibly dangerous and going to result in mass deaths. That was incorrect.
- When Texas eliminated the mask mandate and opened businesses, I was told it was like fumbling the ball at the 1-yard-line and it was stupid, irresponsible, and going to result in mass deaths. That was incorrect.
That is not to say there is no danger. That is not to say that some measure of caution isn't justified. But I'm done listening to the Chicken Littles and I don't believe there is much evidence to justify their level of panic. And that's why most of them don't cite any evidence anymore, they just emote and virtue signal (like the OP has done throughout this thread). The push for continued lockdown and restriction has become fetish.
I believe people can make their own choices and balance cost and benefit however suits them. And to hell with those who can't help themselves but try to bully and cancel and shame those who make different choices.
Trent Nix
Owned and operated Tri Shop
F.I.S.T. Advanced Certified Fitter | Retul Master Certified Fitter (back when those were things)